Re: [Server-devel] [XSCE] Has anyone else seen squid swap.state bloat?

2016-05-10 Thread James Cameron
You don't say why a separate partition is impractical. The Squid intent from antiquity was that the filesystem be separate, which in those days was only practical and performant with separate partition or disk, with a filesystem tuned for many small files. To use a separate filesystem yet avoid

Re: [Server-devel] [XSCE] Has anyone else seen squid swap.state bloat?

2016-05-10 Thread Tim Moody
I don't think it is practical to have a separate partition and while http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ConfiguringSquid#What_.27.27cache_dir.27.27_size_should_I_use.3F talks about a separate partition, it and other docs make it clear that the entire partition should not and need not be

Re: [Server-devel] [XSCE] Has anyone else seen squid swap.state bloat?

2016-05-10 Thread Tim Moody
I don't think it is practical to have a separate partition and while http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ConfiguringSquid#What_.27.27cache_dir.27.27_size_should_I_use.3F talks about a separate partition, it and other docs make it clear that the entire partition should not and need not be

Re: [Server-devel] [XSCE] Has anyone else seen squid swap.state bloat?

2016-05-10 Thread Anish Mangal
I think this is serious enough to warrant atleast a doc note to have the squid cache in a different partition as it makes the machine completely unusable otherwise. I don't think it is maybe the best idea to have it in library (but rather a separate partition). Or, as you say, a cron job - but in

Re: [Server-devel] Fwd: Announcing the release of Fedora 24 Beta for aarch64!

2016-05-10 Thread Adam Holt
On May 10, 2016 7:30 PM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Adam Holt wrote: > > On May 10, 2016 3:21 PM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > >> > >> We do have initial pine64 support, I plan to improve it more for GA

Re: [Server-devel] Fwd: Announcing the release of Fedora 24 Beta for aarch64!

2016-05-10 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Adam Holt wrote: > On May 10, 2016 3:21 PM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: >> >> We do have initial pine64 support, I plan to improve it more for GA and >> have a disk image for use. > > Great News! > > Tangentially: are there

Re: [Server-devel] Fwd: Announcing the release of Fedora 24 Beta for aarch64!

2016-05-10 Thread Adam Holt
On May 10, 2016 3:21 PM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > > We do have initial pine64 support, I plan to improve it more for GA and have a disk image for use. Great News! Tangentially: are there opinions emerging on the physical ruggedizability of 2GB Pine64 v. 1GB RPi3 (incl

Re: [Server-devel] Fwd: Announcing the release of Fedora 24 Beta for aarch64!

2016-05-10 Thread Peter Robinson
We do have initial pine64 support, I plan to improve it more for GA and have a disk image for use. Peter On 10 May 2016 18:44, "Adam Holt" wrote: > Not sure the 64-bit implications of this for RPi3 and Pine64, but FYI. > -- Forwarded message -- > From: "Peter

[Server-devel] Fwd: Announcing the release of Fedora 24 Beta for aarch64!

2016-05-10 Thread Adam Holt
Not sure the 64-bit implications of this for RPi3 and Pine64, but FYI. -- Forwarded message -- From: "Peter Robinson" Date: May 10, 2016 1:34 PM Subject: Announcing the release of Fedora 24 Beta for aarch64! To: ,