[resend from my sub'd address]
Walter, SJ, list
I've drafted this pagehttp://wiki.laptop.org/go/XS_Directory_Layout as
a quick informational guide for what layout we expect from an RPM (or
deb) package. The short of it is: follow Debian's FHS, and we might
grant (and document there) excep
Walter, SJ, list
I've drafted this pagehttp://wiki.laptop.org/go/XS_Directory_Layout as
a quick informational guide for what layout we expect from an RPM (or
deb) package. The short of it is: follow Debian's FHS, and we might
grant (and document there) exceptions as we learn more about the
limits
On Monday 24 March 2008, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> [resend from my sub'd address]
> Walter, SJ, list
>
> I've drafted this pagehttp://wiki.laptop.org/go/XS_Directory_Layout as
> a quick informational guide for what layout we expect from an RPM (or
> deb) package. The short of it is: follow De
Hi Martin,
> Ernie - you know more about Java packaging, perhaps this is a good
> chance to help us. The Debian policy on Java is probably a bit
> stale,
> we can be more pragmatic where appropriate.
Thanks for that.
We have started putting together a deb package for LAMS, so most
like
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Dennis Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As we are based on Fedora I suggest that we follow fedora's packaging
> guidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines The Java
> guidelines are currently being updated
Agreed. When I looked at those
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Dennis Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As we are based on Fedora I suggest that we follow fedora's packaging
> > guidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines The
> > Java guidelines are
