On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Douglas Bagnall
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it seems to work, though I have run out of time to really be sure.
Any hint as to how much you've managed t test?
> http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/dbagnall/ejabberd-rpm.git;a=summary
> http://dev.laptop.org/~db
Guillaume:
>> I hope to soon rebase ejabberd off 2.0.2.
>
>
> Would be good as Gadget requires at least this version to work properly.
Well, it seems to work, though I have run out of time to really be sure.
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/dbagnall/ejabberd-rpm.git;a=summary
http://dev.laptop.
Le mercredi 19 novembre 2008 à 18:54 +1300, Douglas Bagnall a écrit :
> The other day Martin wrote:
>
> > - Trying the SSL patch on the ejabberd version we use. P1 people say
> > that the patch is ok to backport so...
> > ... and of course load testing it to witness the magic decrease in
> > me
The other day Martin wrote:
> - Trying the SSL patch on the ejabberd version we use. P1 people say
> that the patch is ok to backport so...
> ... and of course load testing it to witness the magic decrease in
> memory, and how ssl compress is still in use.
Patched version is here:
http://dev.l
Martin wrote:
> - idmgr needs an extra column to track 'initial group'. Default to
> all the same (base) group. If registrations exceed a low threshold
> (say, 40) we start splitting them into groups according to day of the
> week,
More as an implementation detail than anything else, it is easier
