On 4/26/08, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This deserves its own page, not just a discussion on another page.
Yes, and I think it's 2 pages. One about how to run an XS in an
existing infrastructure, the otherone is how to "size" a high-end XS.
> Martin and I got started in this dire
On 4/26/08, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do dispute any claim that 1Gb/s network interfaces are over the top at
> this point in time. The cost difference on the manufacturing side is
> around $2.
How does it translate to market price? I would put a strong
recommendation for 1Gb
On Apr 25, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Stefan Reitz wrote:
> It may be a little late now for starting a thread for large school
> scenarios, but hopefully
> there will be more (and better prepared) big deployments in the
> future.
> How about expanding the XS wiki page to include strategies for
> ups
> I would prefer to see fairness in access to QoS. We are working with
> oversubscribed networks. QoS simply ensures that one or two students
> will have a good experience while the rest get nothing. Who decides
> which students get the good experience ?And just wait until someones
> fi
On Apr 25, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Stefan Reitz wrote:
> > >> Theoretically, yes... but perhaps this is a bit over the top.
> For the
> > >> space we are aiming...
> > >
> > > please define our aim
> >
> > Martin was correct in that the aim of this discussion is rural
> > schools in
> > Peru. Birmin
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Server-devel] Network Provisioning
> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:03:53 -0400
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; server-devel@lists.laptop.org
>
>
> On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Stefan Reit
Hi,
Although my current setup is not based with APs, but is wired with LTSP,
I can saturate even our 1 GB switches with just 10 youtube feeds... will
there be any video streaming on the XOs? And indeed, Squid does not bother
bottlenecking any of that
David
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:03 PM,
On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Stefan Reitz wrote:
> Hi Y'all,
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 14:57 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:38 PM, John Watlington
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Proposed change to the hardware spec:
>> >
>> > From one to four access point
Hi Y'all,
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 14:57 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:38 PM, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Proposed change to the hardware spec:
>
> From one to four access points may use an simpler switch,
> connected to the server over a 100
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:20 PM, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > if we see a 7-AP setup, it will be there to support either a large
> > number of laptops or a location with obstacles that needs many
> > antennaes. In any case, it will support laptops mostly peering w
> > each other.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:38 PM, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Proposed change to the hardware spec:
>
> From one to four access points may use an simpler switch,
> connected to the server over a 100 Mb/s link. From five to seven
> access points will need a better switch, whi
Proposed change to the hardware spec:
From one to four access points may use an simpler switch,
connected to the server over a 100 Mb/s link. From five to seven
access points will need a better switch, which provides a 1 GB/s
link to the server.
This means that a 1 GB/s interface should be sp
12 matches
Mail list logo
