On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> - there seems to be no routing between 172.18.16.x and 172.18.0.1
>>
>
>GATEWAY1=172.18.1.2
>ADDRESS1=172.18.16.0
>NETMASK1=255.255.248.0
>
> Is routed out eth1 though 1.2, based on the .
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Hi Wad,
>
> It's a good time to sort out our network changes. In our earlier
> discussion about activation you mentioned that you suspected that we
> had dropped or broken a bit of routing or network configuration for
> the XS. Can you give me a bit more background?
>
> T
Hi Wad,
It's a good time to sort out our network changes. In our earlier
discussion about activation you mentioned that you suspected that we
had dropped or broken a bit of routing or network configuration for
the XS. Can you give me a bit more background?
To recap
- XOs looking for activation
