On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Anna ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
My test XS at home has a FQDN and is open to the outside. Therefore this is
probably a pretty rare issue in XS land, but I thought I'd ask.
In general, I'd keep it closed. It's not designed as a full internet server.
Getting them
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 08:24 -0700, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Anna ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
My test XS at home has a FQDN and is open to the outside. Therefore this is
probably a pretty rare issue in XS land, but I thought I'd ask.
In general, I'd keep it
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Anna ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
My test XS at home has a FQDN and is open to the outside. Therefore this
is
probably a pretty rare issue in XS land, but I thought I'd ask.
In
My test XS at home has a FQDN and is open to the outside. Therefore this is
probably a pretty rare issue in XS land, but I thought I'd ask.
I noticed my ambient rx/tx traffic on eth0 had gone from really low (like
0.1 to 0.7 kB/s) to hovering between 5-20 kB/s. I went through httpd's
access_log
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Anna ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
My test XS at home has a FQDN and is open to the outside. Therefore this is
probably a pretty rare issue in XS land, but I thought I'd ask.
I noticed my ambient rx/tx traffic on eth0 had gone from really low (like
0.1 to 0.7
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Tom Mitchell mi...@niftyegg.com wrote:
It can help to block China and Russia but the way spam and denial
of service botnets work that is more limited than you might wish.
Well, I'm not currently running a mail server, so luckily I don't have to
worry about that
