On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:34:07PM -0700, Tom Mitchell wrote:
>Removing the man and info pages is an obvious and necessary step to keep
>within the
>tight space limits of the XO.In a not too urgent future .. I would like to
>see the "rm" become a "mv" so they can be captured and packaged for
>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 04:50:20PM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:10:13PM -0700, Tom Mitchell wrote:
> > I have not looked for the build scripts... Is there a pointer?
>
> http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/mstone/puritan;f=install_hacks.py;hb=devel_jffs2
>
> line 161.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:10:13PM -0700, Tom Mitchell wrote:
> I have not looked for the build scripts... Is there a pointer?
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/mstone/puritan;f=install_hacks.py;hb=devel_jffs2
line 161.
# kill caches and documentation (needs to be done after we finish reading
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:10:13PM -0700, Tom Mitchell wrote:
> Documentation that matches the package set as delivered will be
> needed.
Okay, well, as an example, on Joyride 2286, the effect of the removal
can be demonstrated:
-bash-3.2# rpm -qla | grep /usr/share/man | wc --lines
1449
1449 ma
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:38 PM, James Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:19:30AM -0700, Tom Mitchell wrote:
>> The comment about "Debian version" reminds me to ask about man and
>> info pages. Is there a set of man pages that matches the packages for
>> various XO i
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:19:30AM -0700, Tom Mitchell wrote:
> The comment about "Debian version" reminds me to ask about man and
> info pages. Is there a set of man pages that matches the packages for
> various XO installations? Since XO disk space is small I expect an
> online or school serv
The comment about "Debian version" reminds me to ask about man and info pages.
Is there a set of man pages that matches the packages for various XO
installations? Since XO disk space is small I expect an online or
school server
cache
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 5:08 PM, James Cameron <[EMAIL PR
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 09:40:04AM +1100, David Leeming wrote:
> Thanks James, I think this was a case of a typo and fixation with the
> error staring me in the face!! Sometimes one should look for the
> obvious!!!
;-)
I used the Debian version of ipcalc in my reply. Should you need it,
anot
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James
Cameron
Sent: Saturday, 26 July 2008 10:53 a.m.
To: David Leeming
Cc: server-devel@lists.laptop.org
Subject: Re: [Server-devel] Static Ip settings
G'day David,
Destination host unreachable suggests either incorrect netmask, a route
missi
G'day David,
Destination host unreachable suggests either incorrect netmask, a route
missing on the XS, causing it to use another interface it has, or a
reply from the gateway over ICMP refusing to forward the packets.
Based on the data you sent, I think the network mask is the cause,
especially
I am a little new to Linux at this level, please can the list advise me
regarding changing the network settings for static IP. I'm also not a wizard
on general networking.
I am in the "field" in the Solomon Islands, in the middle of single-class
deployments in 3 primary schools. I have a demo X
11 matches
Mail list logo
