On 22 June 2010 09:46, James Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:51:58AM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> Not really. On recent sugar (0.84?) there is a commandline script that
>> has options to remove the registration. I think it is
>> sugar-control-panel.
>
> It was to be "sugar-control-
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:51:58AM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Not really. On recent sugar (0.84?) there is a commandline script that
> has options to remove the registration. I think it is
> sugar-control-panel.
It was to be "sugar-control-panel -c registration", but was rejected,
so I'm not
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Carlos Daniel Garay Ayala
wrote:
> One of our XS had to be replaced (hd broken).
Ouch!
> Is there a massive-efficient way to unregister and then re register the XO?
Not really. On recent sugar (0.84?) there is a commandline script that
has options to remove the
On 17 June 2010 05:12, Carlos Daniel Garay Ayala
wrote:
> Hello,
> One of our XS had to be replaced (hd broken). The problem is that the XO's
> were already register in the old schoolserver and only a few of them weren't
> register and now are registered in the new XS. Because of this only the XO
Hello,
One of our XS had to be replaced (hd broken). The problem is that the XO's
were already register in the old schoolserver and only a few of them weren't
register and now are registered in the new XS. Because of this only the XO
that are registered on the new XS are being back-upped.
Is ther
