On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:48 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> I performed a code review of the XS source in preparation for porting. I
>> have to dig out my notes and compose an email to Martin
>> with some questions and observations.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:48 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I performed a code review of the XS source in preparation for porting. I
> have to dig out my notes and compose an email to Martin
> with some questions and observations. I hope to send the email to Martin
> this weekend.
Very int
I am still planning on completing the port of XS to ARM for the Sheevaplug /
OpenRD Client.
I recently placed an order for a Guruplug Server Plus to add to my collection
of Kirkwood SOC based devices.
The main delay I have had is waiting for an up to date kernel to become
available for boa
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:35 PM, John Watlington wrote:
> For some reason I find it humorous that we actually have
> to rebuild erlang, not ejabberd-xs... But erlang has already
> been rebuilt, as it is standard with Fedora.
Good point. Erlang is in the arm repos.
The ejabberd-xs rpm (derived
On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:40 PM, John Watlington
> wrote:
>> It would be interesting to hear what the remaining hurdles are.
>
> Not many. There are good bootable images for F11/F12 on ARM. Current
> XS is on F9, for which I haven't found one
It would be interesting to hear what the remaining hurdles are.
The Kirkwood ARM processor in the guruplug should be well
supported by the current Fedora release --- this may be mostly
a matter of moving to an F12 base.
My main concern with the guruplug would be the external USB
disks (overheati
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Caroline Meeks
wrote:
> I was talking to Timothy Falconer who is planning deployments in Haiti
> and Patrick Giagnocavo founder of Zill.net our sysadmin and hosting company
> about this.
> Patrick suggests: http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/c-4-guruplugs.aspx
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:19 AM, David Leeming
wrote:
> Sorry if this has been asked before. The Mac Mini was tested by someone here
> with a watt meter and ran between 16 and 30 watts max. Very useful for solar
> powered locations.
Agreed with Peter -- it'll just work, but other boxes may be chea
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:19 AM, David Leeming
wrote:
> Sorry if this has been asked before. The Mac Mini was tested by someone
> here with a watt meter and ran between 16 and 30 watts max. Very useful for
> solar powered locations.
>
>
>
> Are there any issues with installing XS on one?
>
I don't
Sorry if this has been asked before. The Mac Mini was tested by someone here
with a watt meter and ran between 16 and 30 watts max. Very useful for solar
powered locations.
Are there any issues with installing XS on one?
David Leeming
Solomon Islands
___
10 matches
Mail list logo
