On 10/07/2013 09:51 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> Don't number it 0.4.5, instead number it 0.5, and push any plans you
> had for 0.5 out to 0.6. The sooner you get to 1.0 the more acceptable
> the version number will become. 0.4, based on the descriptions I see,
> is already 1.0 fodder.
We have jus
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:51 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> Don't number it 0.4.5, instead number it 0.5, and push any plans you
> had for 0.5 out to 0.6. The sooner you get to 1.0 the more acceptable
> the version number will become. 0.4, based on the descriptions I see,
> is already 1.0 fodder.
>
Don't number it 0.4.5, instead number it 0.5, and push any plans you
had for 0.5 out to 0.6. The sooner you get to 1.0 the more acceptable
the version number will become. 0.4, based on the descriptions I see,
is already 1.0 fodder.
Ansible sounds fine, but you haven't said what it is for; no app
Since 0.4 was just released, it is a good moment to talk about future
development efforts. I spent this weekend thinking about the progress
we have made through this release, not just in terms of development
effort, but growth as a community. What follows in this email below is
a set of ideas and t
