Now that makes more sense :-)
m
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> 2009/10/12 Martin Langhoff :
>> So that's the issue. I think you sent the wrong patch. No awk line in
>> the patch, at least that I can see...
>
> Odd, lets try again.
>
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
ma
2009/10/12 Martin Langhoff :
> So that's the issue. I think you sent the wrong patch. No awk line in
> the patch, at least that I can see...
Odd, lets try again.
--- create_user.orig2009-10-12 12:36:44.0 +0545
+++ create_user 2009-10-12 12:36:44.0 +0545
@@ -99,6 +99,11 @@
mk
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> What does "sort -u" do? The man page doesn't make it very clear.
Same as sort|uniq, but...
> The awk command I inserted simply removes all lines from a file that
> are a duplicate of another. Or at least I hope it does - I don't
So that's
2009/10/12 Martin Langhoff :
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Reasonable request... I reviewed the patch, expecting you'd be running
> `sort -u` over a tmp copy of authorized_keys, but it does nothing like
> that.
>
> How does it help, then?
What does "sort -u" do? The man page doesn't make it very clear.
The aw
Hi Daniel,
Reasonable request... I reviewed the patch, expecting you'd be running
`sort -u` over a tmp copy of authorized_keys, but it does nothing like
that.
How does it help, then?
cheers,
m
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If an XO re-registers with the XS,
Hi,
If an XO re-registers with the XS, its key is once again appended to
.ssh/authorized_keys. Since introducing automatic registration in
nepal we end up with many duplicate copies of the keys... any chance
this small patch could be added? or that we could overwrite instead of
append to the autho
