RE: Problem w/Clie Mail, SMTP AUTH & James

Chris Means wrote: > I've not seen this problem mentioned before. Which tells us that AUTH PLAIN isn't in wide use. > I keep getting a SMTP Authentication Failed (535). It appears that our AUTH PLAIN implementation is wrong. Outlook works because it uses AUTH LOGIN, which we do have implemente

RE: Temporary problem with hotmail

> I can't currently send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > is there any reason ?? Not without seeing an appropriate extract from your logs. As a best guess, I would assume that the element isn't configured properly, since that is the typical reason. --- Noel

Unix Mailbox Problem

Late in December I got james 2.2.0a15 up and running. I needed this pre-release version because it writes to the unix mailspool. This makes it compatible with my imap software while the james imap package is under development. Apparently, it doesn't write a compliant date in the unix mail spool.

Re: Temporary problem with hotmail

I had this problem (or at least something similar) a while ago, I think the answer made it on to the wiki although I can't remember exactly what the solution turned out to be. -J James wrote: Hello, I can't currently send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is there any reason ?? because using the

RE: mailet error looping

OK my spoolmanager block is as below; presumably the "ToRepository" mailet puts it back on to the spool at the root again if it goes to the error processor? Basically what happens is the message throws a wobbly then is processed again and throws another wobbly with a new tacked on message ID,

RE: mailet error looping

> Errors should go to the error processor, not re-start the ROOT processor. I've seen this sort of loop. My recollection is that if you have a forward type mailet in your ERROR processor, the result go to the root, which can cause this sort of loop if the error is hit again when trying to send th

RE: mailet error looping

> Any ideas why it would do what it does? Tell us what it does! Errors should go to the error processor, not re-start the ROOT processor. Take great care if you're trying to mail errors anywhere... obviously. Take care to position your mailet sensibly in the pipeline, and make sure that it ca

RE: mailet error looping

Thanks however in this case I do actually want the mails to go on to the RemoteDelivery processor irrespective of whether or not my loggin Mailet throws a wobbly or not. Any ideas why it would do what it does? Pete "Jason Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/01/2004 15:20 Please respond to "James Use

RE: mailet error looping

You might want to set the mail state to GHOST in the exception handler in your code (if you have one) That way the message will get no further in the processing chain (I think) -- Jason > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 January 2004 14

mailet error looping

Hi I have a problem where when I have a bug in a mailet, creates an error in the spool. What appears to happen is the message will then reenter the spool at the root with some kind of "error" tagging, which is then processed again by the mailet which errors again and so on, eventually causing

Temporary problem with hotmail

Hello, I can't currently send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is there any reason ?? because using the command line (telnet on port 25 from mx2.hotmail.com), my email arrives... I received the following error from James : Hi. This is the James mail server at news.utopix.ch. I'm afraid I wasn't ab

RE: Problem w/Clie Mail, SMTP AUTH & James

I neglected to mention that I can get (POP3) email, just not send (SMTP) it. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Means [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 7:31 AM > To: 'James Users List' > Subject: Problem w/Clie Mail, SMTP AUTH & James > > Hi, > > I know I'm run

Problem w/Clie Mail, SMTP AUTH & James

Hi, I know I'm running an older version of James (james-2.2.0a4), but I've not seen this problem mentioned before. I've got a Clie PEG-UX50 connecting to my WiFi network. I'm trying to send email from it via Clie Mail. I have configured it correctly as far as I can tell (there really isn't much

Re: Interpreting Subject line

> When it comes to B encoding the subject > line do you really use =?iso-8859-1?B and do you have an example that would > show a compelling reason? Short answer: No I don't Slightly longer answer... I believe it would be a mistake to take a shortcut which would effectively block a legitimate

Re: Interpreting Subject line

Danny > I'm a massive fan of Base64 because it lets you safely transfer any payload through > every torture known to mail, and would hate for it to become blackballed just > because, through lazyness, it allows spammers to obfuscate content. I can understand B encoding on binary attachements of e