RE: hooking RemoteDelivery status

2004-01-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Bosco So wrote: >> What's the best way to do [provide DSN]? DSN support is on the list. If I recall correctly a couple of people were working on it. Changes to LocalDelivery and RemoteDelivery would support it. IIRC, one idea was to attach DSN data as a mail attribute, and then send the mail t

RE: fast fails going to Reply-To: instead of Return-Path:

2004-01-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I'm finding that James is responding to some fast fails with > a bounce message to the email address specified in the > Reply-To: header rather than the Return-Path. See James.bounce(Mail, String, MailAddress). MimeMessage.reply(boolean) prepares the new message using the Reply-To: header. If

RE: too large msg and error msg.

2004-01-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> What I'm looking for is a way to remove attached files of the original > mail only if the error reason is a too big mail according to > maxmessagesize. That is a catch-22. JavaMail can't load the entire message into memory because it is too big. JavaMail can't edit unless it can load the entir

Re: too large msg and error msg.

2004-01-17 Thread Carl
I've tested that, however it seems that it removes the whole original mail, not just the attached files of the original mail. What I'm looking for is a way to remove attached files of the original mail only if the error reason is a too big mail according to maxmessagesize. Carl Noel J. Bergman

RE: understanding matcher/mailet pairs

2004-01-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> finding out how to understand the matcher/mailet concept http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] che.org&by=thread&from=581137 > after each mailet processes a mail, the state of the message > is examined. If the state has been changed, the message does > not continue in the current

RE: too large msg and error msg.

2004-01-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Well, not really, I have already a spam processor You missed his point, specifically: > >none > The key is the element. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: too large msg and error msg.

2004-01-17 Thread Carl
Well, not really, I have already a spam processor, whitch is configure as you precise. I make the distinction between spam and error msg (two distinct processors) Thanks anyway, Carl Bosco So wrote: The first matcher/mailet pair in either "local-address-error" or "relay-denied" processors

Re: too large msg and error msg.

2004-01-17 Thread Bosco So
The first matcher/mailet pair in either "local-address-error" or "relay-denied" processors has the following: none Is this whay you were looking for? [...] Then, if [EMAIL PROTECTED] send a too huge mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], there is a erro

too large msg and error msg.

2004-01-17 Thread Carl
Hi, I'm using James 2.2.0a15 with MySQL on Linux RedHat with java 1.4.1. to manage mails for mydomain.com. In MySQL the max_allowed_packet si set to 13631488 (i.e : 13 Mo) On the SMTP block in config.xml I have : 1 (i.e : arround 10 Mo I keep a 30% with max_allowed_packet according to the

fast fails going to Reply-To: instead of Return-Path:

2004-01-17 Thread Bosco So
As I noted in a previous message, I'm finding that James is responding to some fast fails with a bounce message to the email address specified in the Reply-To: header rather than the Return-Path. Is this behavior correct? (In my app, the Reply-To:, Return-Path:, and From: are all different.) I

Re: hooking RemoteDelivery status

2004-01-17 Thread Bosco So
I'm spooling VERPed emails to a James server for remote delivery. I want to record in a database table the ultimate status of each delivery (after all retries). What's the best way to do this? A blind approach is to extend the RemoteDelivery mailet to record successes and failures and replace

Re: Virtual Hosting

2004-01-17 Thread Serge Knystautas
Matt Anderson wrote: Thank you serge for you reply. I greatly appreciate it however I have a follow up question. If POP3 protocol has no support for my problem (shown below) then it would be safe to assume that you would have to do this form of redirection to other mailboxes on all email server

RE: Virtual Hosting

2004-01-17 Thread Matt Anderson
Hi All, Thank you serge for you reply. I greatly appreciate it however I have a follow up question. If POP3 protocol has no support for my problem (shown below) then it would be safe to assume that you would have to do this form of redirection to other mailboxes on all email servers? Thanks aga