Hi all,
Thanks for the help with my previous question; I have another issue that is
a huge problem at the moment and I hope someone will be able to help me out here
:
I'm getting the e-mails that I have already received , multiple times. If I
sit and monitor the outgoing folder, I can see
hi all...
i've some problems here n any help are greatly appreciated...
i want to try directing all emails to be handled by my custom class instead of the default ToProcessor...
here's a part of my config.xml file for my james. What it does here basically is any e-mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
I recently move from 2.1.3 and don't have any problems. I'd recommend
merging the old config into the new one rather than the other way around.
OTOH if you can wait, maybe the release will come out this week.
bill
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent
no troubles with the list at all here..
..and the unsubscribe feature works flawlessly
CUTMAN
From: Tyler Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is because, last I checked the unsubscribe service didn't work.
I didn't submit it, but I am not surprised that someone did. As for me, I
just
filter it out.
__
This is because, last I checked the unsubscribe service didn't work.
I didn't submit it, but I am not surprised that someone did. As for me,
I just
filter it out.
bill wrote:
one of the problems may be that some of the other lists were submitted
to the spamcop rbl list and i think that may hav
one of the problems may be that some of the other lists were submitted to the
spamcop rbl list and i think that may have caused an inordinate amount of retries.
b
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Are there problems with this list today?
Just slow mail service. I guess people notice. LOL Lots of questio
The code in the article is a collection of code from different sources. I am
pretty sure it uses the Mailet API properly, so it shouldn't matter what
type of repository you use to store the mail.
Kraig
- Original Message -
From: "jaysheel bhavsar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Users Lis
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 May 2004 21:04
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: UK meetup
>
>
> Ah! The wonders of webmail. I've relocated to Porto
> Heli/Greece this week.
And now I'm back. I expected to see some progress on this thread
> 2.1.3 has been 100% stable for me, and i have seen loads
> of errors on the list regarding 2.2.0!
Looked at what has been fixed in James 2.2.0 that was broken in James 2.1.3.
My take would be that most of the issues related to the James 2.2.0 release
condidates related to reducing the use of J
> Are there problems with this list today?
Just slow mail service. I guess people notice. LOL Lots of questions
about it today. Basically, the mail server was flooded. It held up fine,
but was slow clearing its backlog.
--- Noel
-
Daniel Perry wrote:
My favoured option is to write a struts plug-in, which uses a simple
database table to queue messages (reliable) or a vector (less reliable but
simpler), and implements an inject method, and this causes a thread to be
started if no thread exists that deals with delivery. This t
Kraig,
I have james up and running with out any modifications except that it uses
dbfile rather than file for storing mail. I am currently trying to integrate
the code from your article into james. My question is that your article have
a different syntax for "repository" than what the config
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
2. If a virus is found the email is ghosted without a bounce for the reasons you said.
I've created a separate address to send bounces for mesages like this
(e.g., [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Also, I was thinki
Hi,
I've currently got one mail server running james 2.1.3 (albeit a slightly
customised version).
I've got to set up a second server, so do i stick with 2.1.3, or do i go for
2.2.0 rc4?
My only hesitation is because 2.1.3 has been 100% stable for me, and i have
seen loads of errors on the list
Are there problems with this list today?
I sent today a few hours ago to it three messages and I did not receive them back.
Vincenzo
P.S. If there are problems and I don't receive *this* message back, I will not know if
it is only a problem of mine with the list or a more general one. "If it wo
> > By blocking HTML, you're effectively encouraging these new 5-line
> > text-only spam messages that force me to read half a sentence
> > before destroying.
>
> Have you looked to see if a bayesian filter will catch them?
The only spam messages my bayesian filter is not able to catch are HTML c
> What I have now is Postfix running on "localhost", which is roughly
> equivalent. However, if Postfix dies, I have a problem because e-mails
> may be lost.
>
> With an integrated James, if James dies, my entire JVM dies, and ...
> a) I have a problem to solve anyway (my app is down) ;-)
> b) But
Serge,
> Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
> > 2. If a virus is found the email is ghosted without a bounce for the reasons you
> > said.
>
> I've created a separate address to send bounces for mesages like this
> (e.g., [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> Also, I was thinking th
Noel,
> Your approach seems reasonable because you're not bouncing most virii, you
> are trying to just bounce potentially legitimate attachments to let the
> sender know that they aren't permitted to send them.
>
> I'm wondering if one could consider accepting such attachments if the
> message i
Most email administrators prefer to blackhole viruses and known spam
because of the high cost of intervention, inspection and the low-return
of value about the source of same.
-Lane
Serge Knystautas wrote:
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
2. If a virus is found the email is ghosted without a bou
20 matches
Mail list logo
