Noel,
Thankyou. Sorry for beating a dead horse on this.
Greg
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I agree that the IPv6 IP's, bogus or otherwise, could cause a problem
but that does not alter the fact that JAMES is throwing the exception
(that is not getting caught), nor do I understand why JAMES was ch
> I agree that the IPv6 IP's, bogus or otherwise, could cause a problem
> but that does not alter the fact that JAMES is throwing the exception
> (that is not getting caught), nor do I understand why JAMES was changed
> from a scheme that works fine
Because it didn't work fine. It had serious iss
Noel,
I agree that the IPv6 IP's, bogus or otherwise, could cause a problem
but that does not alter the fact that JAMES is throwing the exception
(that is not getting caught), nor do I understand why JAMES was changed
from a scheme that works fine even with the bogus IP's (a17) to the
current
Danny Angus wrote:
Let me see
I have james configured james to recive mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1-If I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I don't need to do smtp-auth?
2- If I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] through james, I need to do smtp-auth?
Is this right?
I need that james only accept me
Does anyone know of either
a matcher/mailet or some classes I could use to produce my mailet that strips
HTML? I've seen some references to linux / sendmail ones. I don't
really need to strip attachments as I strip all but zip files at the
firewall.
thanks
bill
page
If you send to a local recipient authentication is not required.
If you send to a remote user authentication is required.
What I think is happening is that you are sending to a local address, which
doesn't *require* authentication, but if you provide credentials they will
be considered.
d.
Hi,
i'm currently using the new james 2.2.0 and i have configured the
config.xml to use smtp autentication:
25
server1
true
true
0
Now, when i try to send a email to the james smtp server with my outlook
with no client au
