Gili wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:35:16 -0500, Serge Knystautas wrote:
>
> >Ahmed Mohombe wrote:
> >>> a) we're developing on the branch "branch_2_1", not the
> MAIN branch.
> >>
> >> Interesting. Are there other "unusual issues" with JAMES
> like the above
> >> that a new user should know (be
> I just wanted to "build from the source" to learn about JAMES first,
> The problem in JAMES case was that the project didn't even compiled, and
> this is very discouraging for new users.
That's fine. The only caveat, which any of the active JAMES developers
could have told you, is that the sta
James is extremely stable and functional in its niche,
I hear this "niche" again and again, but I do not understand it. Isn't
mail the most used medium? Why is James a "niche" product and sendmail
or postfix not? Since JAMES is in Java, it should be even more spreaded
than the others :).
If yo
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:35:16 -0500, Serge Knystautas wrote:
>Ahmed Mohombe wrote:
>>> a) we're developing on the branch "branch_2_1", not the MAIN branch.
>>
>> Interesting. Are there other "unusual issues" with JAMES like the above
>> that a new user should know (before in his desperation aband
Gili wrote:
Know this is open source, and if you want something done, feel free to
do so.
Not to be too cynical here, but this is really bad feedback
coming back from a development team. All the projects I've had the
displeasure of dealing with that have stated: "This is open-source,
what more
a) we're developing on the branch "branch_2_1", not the MAIN branch.
Interesting. Are there other "unusual issues" with JAMES like the above
that a new user should know (before in his desperation abandons JAMES)?
b) we've migrated to SVN,
And what's the address? On what branch are you developing
Ahmed Mohombe wrote:
a) we're developing on the branch "branch_2_1", not the MAIN branch.
Interesting. Are there other "unusual issues" with JAMES like the above
that a new user should know (before in his desperation abandons JAMES)?
Know this is open source, and if you want something done, feel f
I believe james has moved to subversion (svn.apache.org).
Also, what tag are you downloading? I think HEAD is for the next-gen james
server! Use branch_2_1_fcs as thats the branch for a usable james server. Or
build_2_2_0_fcs for the most recent release.
Daniel.
> -Original Message-
> Fr
Ahmed Mohombe wrote:
If one checks JAMES fresh from CVS and tries to run ant on it will
receive a lot of compiler errors and the build process will fail.
a) we're developing on the branch "branch_2_1", not the MAIN branch.
b) we've migrated to SVN, though nobody has updated the site for this yet.
To conclude this thread... it looks like my router is retarded.
"If you want the 510 v4 to do a nameserver for your LAN and your needs
are beyond the simple name - address resolving, stay away from it.
It cannot handle nor forward anything but A and PTR queries, making
it impossible to run a mails
Hi,
I was doing the same things in paralell on windows and linux, and on
windows if I follow the "quick start" : start, stop, configure...,
doesn't work:
- on windows the apps/james contains no SAR-INF after stoping it (while
it runs, the directory with the config files is there).
This effect t
11 matches
Mail list logo
