I can understand why we need to use javamail since I have found the
saveChanges at almost all mailets in James.
org/apache/james/transport/mailets/AddHabeasWarrantMark.java:
message.saveChanges();
org/apache/james/transport/mailets/LocalDelivery.java:
localMessage.saveChanges();
org/apache/james/t
Hello,
How can I add user programatically ?
Thanks for any advices :)
Pawel
How do I set different matcher rules based upon the servername? In
otherwords our James box has different names listed in the servernames
tag and I need to be able to specify different matchers depending on
which servername the mail came in on which won't neccessarily match the
from address? Is
Sorry,
I make amendments. I did the test using the mime4j java app using Swing GUI.
But just now I used my mailet:
public void mime4jService(Mail mail) throws MessagingException {
MimeMessageWrapper mimeMessageWrapper = (MimeMessageWrapper)
mail.getMessage();
try {
Edward Tan wrote:
> I have tried mime4j just now and I compared it with James that uses Javax
> mail.
Thank you for your tests!
> So it seems a bit dangerous to use javax.mail since we will never know when
> some emails will go to error folder because of OutOfMemory.
Mime4j let us only to read m
I have tried mime4j just now and I compared it with James that uses Javax
mail.
For the same 30+ MB message:
Timing:
mime4j: around 1 minute 20 seconds
javax.mail: 10 seconds
Memory:
mime4j -> without extra memory (default java -without any argument)
javax.mail -> -Xms512M -Xmx768M (without thi
> getFlags is not really important. But it also crashes when I try to get the
> filename of the attachment, i.e. message.getFilename (of the Part). I am not
> sure if there is other way to get the filename of the attachments. The email
> header certainly does not contain the filename of the attachm
Hi,
getFlags is not really important. But it also crashes when I try to get the
filename of the attachment, i.e. message.getFilename (of the Part). I am not
sure if there is other way to get the filename of the attachments. The email
header certainly does not contain the filename of the attachment
Carl Vorster wrote:
> Thanks Stefano for the reply, but in my debugging process I created a new
> empty db and still got the same results - any other thoughts ?
Maybe the problem is in your network or in name resolution between the 2
machines.
How much does it take to run a mysql client from the s
Thanks Stefano for the reply, but in my debugging process I created a new
empty db and still got the same results - any other thoughts ?
Thanks
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Stefano Bagnara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 5:51 PM
To: James Users List
Subject: R
> Is it possible to store it into temporary file? Using more memory does not
> guarantee the stability, unless the email size is limited. But this is not
> practical since it reduces James scalability. In a very busy server where
> there many (~ 100 users at any time at peak), it can make the heap
Carl Vorster wrote:
> Have any of you ran into a similar situation, or can point me into the right
> direction of why this is happening?
> mysql
repair table spool;
repair table inbox;
exit;
Let me know if this solve your problem.
Mysql tables must be manually optimized (repair run the optimiza
Does anyone know of a JAMES book or online resource with good tutorials
or examples?
Thanks,
Kevin
Mailets are designed to help filter a message while it's processed,
not check things afterward. This is a pretty straight-forward
JavaMail, at least for the inboxes part. For the outgoing folder
check, you could modify RemoteDelivery mailet and add your own check
for that header before attempted
Hi,
Mail server:
James 2.2.0
JDK 1.5
Windows 2000 server
Repository:
MySql 4.1 on dedicated db server
Windows 2000 server
I've been running James 2.2.0 in a production environment without problems
for a couple of months now. Yesterday James's response times suddenly
dropped to almost standstill
Flags flags = message.getFlags();
And I tried java mail 1.4ea and it is the same as 1.3.2, it runs out of
heap.
I think sun Java implementation to put everything into memory is not
scalable. We are talking about email attachment and not java POJO. And for
very busy server like one
Hi Stefano,
I have tried
ByteArrayInputStream headersIn = new
SharedByteArrayInputStream(headers.toByteArray());
but it still runs out of heap.
I used
-Xms512M -Xmx768M
but it made my system sluggish with swapping memory-file.
Is it possible to store it into temporary f
> Is it possible to store it into temporary file? Using more memory does not
> guarantee the stability, unless the email size is limited. But this is not
> practical since it reduces James scalability.
There's no way we can control how sun javamail handle our messages.
We should write our own jav
Edward Tan wrote:
> Yes!
>
> } catch(Throwable t) {
> System.out.println(t.getMessage());
> t.printStackTrace();
>
> >
>
> Java heap space
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
The only solution is to increase the memory available to java (-Xmx500M
fo
Hi Stefano,
I have tried
ByteArrayInputStream headersIn = new
SharedByteArrayInputStream(headers.toByteArray());
but it still runs out of heap.
Is it possible to store it into temporary file? Using more memory does not
guarantee the stability, unless the email size is limi
Yes!
} catch(Throwable t) {
System.out.println(t.getMessage());
t.printStackTrace();
>
Java heap space
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
On 12/30/05, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Edward Tan wrote:
> > The exception is caught somew
Edward Tan wrote:
> The exception is caught somewhere, so I set at earlier calling function
> stack.
> But
>
> message is null
>
> and it goes to finally.
If it execute the finally, the message is null and the 2
System.out.printlm are not called then it could be a throwable (probably
an error, a
The exception is caught somewhere, so I set at earlier calling function
stack.
But
message is null
and it goes to finally.
Somewhere the exception is caught and never thrown back.
--
private synchronized void loadMessage() throws MessagingException {
if (message != n
I haven't pasted the exception message since I am confused why my Eclipse
couldn't stop at the generic Exception and goes directly to finally. Or
maybe my eyes are too tired.
The exception is caught here, inside
org.apache.james.core.MimeMessageWrapper
--
private synchroniz
Edward Tan wrote:
> I just found out the culprit, it is not James code. It is
> javax.mail.MimeMessage
> [...]
> if (is instanceof SharedInputStream) {
> SharedInputStream sis = (SharedInputStream)is;
> contentStream = sis.newStream(sis.getPosition(), -1);
> } else {
>
I wrapped it with MimeMessageWrapper and it still crashed.
The culprit is inside javax.mail
public static byte[] getBytes(InputStream is) throws IOException {
int len;
int size = 1024;
byte [] buf;
if (is instanceof ByteArrayInputStream) {
size = is.available();
I just found out the culprit, it is not James code. It is
javax.mail.MimeMessage
Exactly:
/**
* Byte array that holds the bytes of this Message's content.
*/
protected byte[] content;
...
content = ASCIIUtility.getBytes(is);
in:
protected void parse(InputStream
Where is the stack trace?
We need at least to know the Exception type and the error message.
The logfile would also help.
Maybe the problem is that message.getFlags() was not wrapped in the
MimeMessageWrapper for 2.2.0. I committed yesterday a patch to
MimeMessageWrapper adding a few missing wrapp
Hi,
James suddenly crash when I receive > 30MB attachment. I didn't check the
threshold of message size that causes this. I just happened to send 34 MB
attachment through Thunderbird to James. The problem is caused by my mailet
which tries to get the flag:
in my my mailet:
messa
29 matches
Mail list logo
