Hi,
not sure, but your antispam mailets sit in the bounces processor.
Would it be possible that our first 2 log lines refer to a mail, and the
the 3rd log line where hotmail mail is delivered refer to another mail ?
Can you move the antispam mailets at the top of the transport processor
for e
Right - it doesn't exist. I was following the link from this page:
http://people.apache.org/~eric/james/20110517/site/config.html
But yes, your link [1] gets me the file I was looking for.
In reading it over again closely, I noted that I need to make a change
to conf/context/james-server-cont
I don't know any other "product" which allows this. Now its even
possible to hook in the SMTP handling and call your own logic.
Bye,
Norman
2011/5/23 Something Something :
> Wow, "Useless" is a pretty strong word and it appears it's a relative
> concept in this case. What you find useless is wha
2011/5/23 Darko Hojnik :
> Am 23.05.2011, 17:47 Uhr, schrieb Norman Maurer
> :
>
>> Am Montag, 23. Mai 2011 schrieb Darko Hojnik :
>>>
>>> Am 21.05.2011, 16:55 Uhr, schrieb BobU :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Judging from how little literature I've found about mailets and James in
>>> general, I get the impress
Wow, "Useless" is a pretty strong word and it appears it's a relative
concept in this case. What you find useless is what we find useful.
Anyway, why don't we change the tone of this email to be a bit more
positive? How about we discuss the alternatives to James?
The reason we chose James over o
Am 23.05.2011, 17:47 Uhr, schrieb Norman Maurer
:
Am Montag, 23. Mai 2011 schrieb Darko Hojnik :
Am 21.05.2011, 16:55 Uhr, schrieb BobU :
Judging from how little literature I've found about mailets and James in
general, I get the impression that James never took off. Is anyone
using it,
Am Montag, 23. Mai 2011 schrieb Darko Hojnik :
> Am 21.05.2011, 16:55 Uhr, schrieb BobU :
>
>
>
> Judging from how little literature I've found about mailets and James in
> general, I get the impression that James never took off. Is anyone using it,
> other than the two references (inVue and JSende
Am 21.05.2011, 16:55 Uhr, schrieb BobU :
Judging from how little literature I've found about mailets and James in
general, I get the impression that James never took off. Is anyone using
it,
other than the two references (inVue and JSender) mentioned on the Apache
site? I'm wondering whether
Eric Charles-2 wrote:
>
> On 22/05/2011 19:23, BobU wrote:
>> I don't need to know the names of companies using James; just a feel for
>> how
>> many big companies are. Is it 10? 20? 100?
>
> Hi,
>
> What is a big company ? 1.000, 10.000, 50.000 employees ? :)
>
> It will be difficult to know
any help on this? i want to try the spam filtering actually works by preventing
hotmail ip to send me emails.
On 21-May-2011, at 11:38 PM, Daniel Tan wrote:
> hi,
>
> i am trying to classify mail from hotmail as spam but in my console, there is
> an entry 65.55.116.* which authorizes hotmail
Yes, only one of the startTLS/socketTLS, not both (mutual exclusive) -
See also [1] for the difference between TLS and SSL.
If your security requirement is strong, helloName is good to change.
Don't hesitate to inform us with additional security you would implement
so we can document it.
Yes
hi eric,
so to have encrypted traffic, i need to enable startTLS or socketTLS? my self
signed cert is working fine but i need the mail traffic to be encrypted so that
no one can snoop the traffic.
i actually managed to hide the james name by using my own helloName. if u
enable it, the port used
Title: Documento senza titolo
In my company we use James for implement Italian PEC (Italian
Certified Electronic Mail) http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6109/
and it works very well.
Il 22/05/2011 19:55, Eric Charles ha scritto:
On
22/05/2011 19:23, BobU wro
Hi,
The link you gave does not exist.
Are you talking about [1] ?
If this is the case, don't forget to update the spring configuration
file as written in [1]
If you want to be sure your smtpserver-ssl.xml is really processed,
simply put a bad tag inside and you should see an exception on sta
I will update the documentation to tell the bind port should be changed
to 993 (standard imap4 ssl)
Whatever the defined port, on encrypted socket, james will still
announce unencrypted "* OK JAMES IMAP4rev1 Server Server
laptop-techteam.b2boost.local. is ready.".
After, the bytes mus be en
Hi There
Basically I'm filtering my incoming emails based on the recipients. To do
that I implemented a GenericRecipientMatcher that uses a regex to
discriminate which recipient will be "processed" and which one not.
So I tested it sending an email with one recipient that does match the regex
and
16 matches
Mail list logo
