Re: TLS protocol versions - defaults for all listeners/mail protocols?

Hello Wojtek, On 21/06/2023 10:44, Wojtek wrote: Hi, Is there a way to configure list of default TLS protocols for all enabled listeners instead of modifying configuration file for each one (i.e. ``)? I think we have no such things like default value accross all protocols. Maybe we as a proj

Re: It's not possible to create folder which name starts with hash-sign (#)

By the way https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3501#section-5.1 5)Two characters, "#" and "&", have meanings by convention, and should be avoided except when used in that convention.-- Best regards, Benoit TELLIER General manager of Linagora VIETNAM. Product owner for Team-M

Re: It's not possible to create folder which name starts with hash-sign (#)

Hello Wojtek, That is because James employs a folder hierarchy where '#' is used to denote a namespace. #private:wojtek:INBOX denotes your inbox on which I would have a shared access. #shared:marketting:INBOX denotes a shared mailbox for the marketting team. I bet you could do: #private:wojtek:

It's not possible to create folder which name starts with hash-sign (#)

Hi, I ran into an issue when importing mails from other servers - it seems that it's not possible to create folder which name starts with hash-sign, e.g.: "#testfolder". I tested other mail servers (gmail, mailu [postfix?], fastmail [cyrrus?], mailbox.org, infomaniak [no idea what they use]) a

Re: SPF record: not found for host

hi Gunter >And yes, by other domains all works fine. Google sucks :-) -- David Matthews m...@dmatthews.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@ja

Re: SPF record: not found for host

Hi, > And yes, by other domains all works fine. sorry, after wrote, the next problem with "myfritz.net": DNS: v=spf1 ip4:212.42.244.0/24 ip6:2001:bf0:244::/48 -all I think it's a james-problem. The problems is with incoming mails, I recieve the mails an can read it without problems. Best wi

Re: SPF record: not found for host

Hi David, That's ironic: because of a hint from my provider to set up SPF to be on the safe side (because of Google!), I dealt with the topic. And now, of all people, should Google not be configured properly? It would be possible. The warning isn't really a problem, I can receive and send ema

Re: SPF record: not found for host

Hi David, That's ironic: because of a hint from my provider to set up SPF to be on the safe side (because of Google!), I dealt with the topic. And now, of all people, should Google not be configured properly? It would be possible. The warning isn't really a problem, I can receive and send ema

Re: SPF record: not found for host

>I'm using the spf-mailet now and test it. I found this warning in the log file: >"No SPF record found for host: googlemail.com" > >So I checked "googlemail.com" by mxtoolbox.com >DNS-Record: v=spf1 redirect=_spf.google.com Obvious things first - does your setup deal with SPF records for other dom

SPF record: not found for host

Hi, I'm using the spf-mailet now and test it. I found this warning in the log file: "No SPF record found for host: googlemail.com" So I checked "googlemail.com" by mxtoolbox.com DNS-Record: v=spf1 redirect=_spf.google.com The Tool found not any problems. Somebody know about such problems or a s