Re: Local DNS

2004-12-14 Thread John Patterson
To conclude this thread... it looks like my router is retarded. "If you want the 510 v4 to do a nameserver for your LAN and your needs are beyond the simple name - address resolving, stay away from it. It cannot handle nor forward anything but A and PTR queries, making it impossible to run a mails

Re: Local DNS

2004-11-16 Thread John Patterson
Daniel Perry netcase.co.uk> writes: > 1. a remote dns server can find the domain > 2. your local dns server can't find the domain > 3. your local dns server can find other domains Yes this is all true. It can find other domains as long as I have visited them once already (eg with browser) so th

Re: Local DNS

2004-11-15 Thread John Patterson
Danny Angus slc.co.uk> writes: > 1/ because it doesn't delegate lookups > 2/ because it might also be stymied by your firewall > 3/ because your paranoid network admins won't let you. > > Look at the operating system NS settings on the server. The firewall is also the DNS and DHCP server and th

Local DNS

2004-11-13 Thread John Patterson
Hi, I have James set up at home behind a firewalled ADSL router and I was wondering why I cannot send remote mail. I am using the default configuration which has suto detected my internal DNS server at 10.0.0.138. Why would this DNS server not allow James to resolve external addresses? Messages

Re: Real domain name required for sender address

2004-02-07 Thread John Patterson
Cheers, that was indeed the problem. - Original Message - From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "John Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 1:08 PM Subject:

Real domain name required for sender address

2004-02-06 Thread John Patterson
Hi, Why do I get this message: 553 5.5.4 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Real domain name required for sender address even though this is commented out: Thanks, John.