On 20.10.2008, at 10:12, zkn wrote:
I found a bug with exactly the same problem but the answer was the
same as Martijn's - spool does not work with dbfile.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-309
But there are examples for spool configurations with dbfile
everywhere an
apache.org/server/2.3.1/using_database.html
Which is true?
On 19.10.2008, at 20:11, zkn wrote:
This is from the example configuration in JAMES distribution:
I suppose that spool is considered mail repository, not like nntp or
users store.
Perhaps the attachment was deleted by the m
:
DBFile cannot be used for spool only for mail repositories
See http://james.apache.org/server/2.3.1/repositories.html
Martijn
BTW I did not see any attachment
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 19:35 +0300, zkn wrote:
Hi,
we use James as a smart host - it receives all emails and then
forwards some of them to
Hi,
we use James as a smart host - it receives all emails and then
forwards some of them to our main server. I tried to switch it from
file storage to dbfile storage but then james started forwarding only
the headers of the emails. The source of the emails was missing. Can
anyone help?
On 30.07.2008, at 13:24, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
On 30.07.2008, at 12:40, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
On 25.07.2008, at 10:50, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
On 25.07.2008, at 10:12, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
With many mails the db based spool repository is
On 30.07.2008, at 12:40, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
On 25.07.2008, at 10:50, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
On 25.07.2008, at 10:12, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
With many mails the db based spool repository is much better.
Change of processor is done by updating few fields
On 25.07.2008, at 10:50, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
On 25.07.2008, at 10:12, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
With many mails the db based spool repository is much better.
Change of processor is done by updating few fields in a db record.
Stefano
Thanks Stefano.
Now when we have so many
On 25.07.2008, at 10:12, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
With many mails the db based spool repository is much better.
Change of processor is done by updating few fields in a db record.
Stefano
Thanks Stefano.
Now when we have so many files in the file system is it still possible
to switch to db s
x27;m trying to find a way to quickly process them.
Reading and writing to the disk every time the emails goes from one
processor to another is slow and and our configuration has several
processors. I changed the configuration to have less processors.
On 24.07.2008, at 18:48, zkn wrote:
Hi,
I noticed today that some of our emails are being processed very slow
through the spool. I managed to fasten the processing by switching to
a newer java version but still doesn't seem quick enough.
What could possibly cause this problem and is there a way to fix that?
We are using Jame
Hi,
we have a server where all incoming emails despite the recipient are
saved in a single folder. To get the real recipient of an email we
parse the Received headers of the message but in rare cases the
recipient's address is not there.
We already have a mailet that adds a custom header to
Is there any log analyzer application for james? For example I would
like to see statistics for daily received count, sent count, received
count by host.
Ozkan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
On 25.04.2007, at 05:04, maomaode wrote:
Yes, i followed the steps in http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-4.1-
doc/ssl-howto.html
I guess it's self signed certificate, right? i'm really not goot at
it. is there any way i can verify if it's self-signed?
Yes, that is a self signed certificate. Ot
Do you use a self signed certificate for james? If yes have you added
it in the trusted certificates store of the client's java?
It's possible that your client works with google because google's
certificate is issued by a trusted authority.
On 24.04.2007, at 17:03, maomaode wrote:
Hi,
I've
On 06.04.2007, at 16:40, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
Hi,
now when I already have james 2.3 running I see some .m64 files in
temp directory.
These are obviously email sources. I noticed that most of the
files appear and then disappear but some files are there for about
16
I think you should put these two options in the smtpserver
configuration:
true
127.0.0.0/8
This will block the relay-denied messages.
On 06.04.2007, at 19:27, rmasonjr wrote:
After cranking-up James, the number of physical files generated in the
/opt/james/james-2.2.0/apps/james/var/mail f
Hi,
now when I already have james 2.3 running I see some .m64 files in
temp directory.
These are obviously email sources. I noticed that most of the files
appear and then disappear but some files are there for about 16 hours
already.
What are these files and should I worry about them?
Oz
Yes, the new jar together with the environment.xml change fixed the
problem. Now james starts normally without any delay.
Thank you!
On 05.04.2007, at 20:13, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Finally I managed to recreate the problematic environment here
(james 2.3.0 and a lot of files inside the app
53,1-8
Should I also post this dump stack to the jira?
Stefano
zkn ha scritto:
On 30.03.2007, at 12:22, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
Have in mind that this MYOWN directory contains a really big
tree of folders an
On 30.03.2007, at 12:22, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
Have in mind that this MYOWN directory contains a really big tree
of folders and files - ~50GB. It will be really slow even if james|
phoenix tries only to go trough all of them.
I think that's all I can give as informatio
On 28.03.2007, at 16:36, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
On 27.03.2007, at 14:31, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
I run it on RedHat EL3. James is running as root - I don't know
if it is possible to run it as different user and bind it on
port 25.
No, with james 2.3
On 27.03.2007, at 14:31, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
I run it on RedHat EL3. James is running as root - I don't know if
it is possible to run it as different user and bind it on port 25.
No, with james 2.3 this is not possible.
In trunk we added support for commons-daemo
a.lang.OutOfMemoryError
WARN2007-03-27 03:26:51.745 [Phoenix.] (): Failed to stop
application james as it is not initialized/started.
On 27.03.2007, at 13:40, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn ha scritto:
Thanks,
I have forgotten that I have to remove the blocks from
assembly.xml if it was t
tp and pop3 you have to leave them but add
'enabled="false"' in their configuration block.
Otherwise you can remove the xml block but you will have to remove
also their declaration from assembly.xml
PS: increase your log level to DEBUG in your /apps/
james/SAR-INF/enviro
I'm trying to upgrade from james-2.2.0 to 2.3.0 but something is
going wrong.
The first problem is that pop3 and nntp will always start though I
have removed them from the configuration file.
The second problem is that when I replace the PHOENIX_BASE/apps/james/
var with a symlink to the o
23/07, zkn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
.
We run james configured to accept emails for several domains. Each
domain has different IP configured in DNS.
Is it possible to set up james to use different IP for each domain
for outgoing emails?
Hello,
We run james configured to accept emails for several domains. Each
domain has different IP configured in DNS.
Is it possible to set up james to use different IP for each domain
for outgoing emails?
Ozkan
-
To unsubs
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
zkn wrote:
Hi,
Does JAMES have a DNS cache and where it is stored?
We are running a JAMES server which forwards emails to another mail
server. We had a problem with the second mail server so we moved it
to a new machine and we made the necessary DNS configuration
like that for quite some time.
bye
Norman
zkn schrieb:
Hi,
.
Does JAMES have a DNS cache and where it is stored?
.
We are running a JAMES server which forwards emails to another mail
server. We had a problem with the second mail server so we moved it to
a new machine a
Hi,
Does JAMES have a DNS cache and where it is stored?
We are running a JAMES server which forwards emails to another mail
server. We had a problem with the second mail server so we moved it to a
new machine and we made the necessary DNS configuration changes.
nslookup on the machine where JA
30 matches
Mail list logo
