On 8/18/2012 5:27 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
Hi,
We tackle distributed UID generation via
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-103
We have a first snapshot implementation (undocumented) with UID
generated by a Zookeeper Ensemble in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailbox/trunk/
Hi,
We tackle distributed UID generation via
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-103
We have a first snapshot implementation (undocumented) with UID
generated by a Zookeeper Ensemble in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailbox/trunk/zoo-seq-provider
I understand Joshua is u
On 08/17/2012 08:48 PM, tim wrote:
...
(i'm not affiliated with Apache James, just thoughts)
In fact, replying on this mailing-list, you are part of the community.
So, Welcome! :)
On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Joshua Armstrong wrote:
Hi, James users.
My company is using James to handle
On 8/17/2012 4:09 PM, tim wrote:
interesting.
I think replacing that "getId" with either the embedded message-id or hashing
something should work then. No?
As long as Apache james generating a new uidvalidity number for each instance
of james. I'm assuming it is a random number.
The client
interesting.
I think replacing that "getId" with either the embedded message-id or hashing
something should work then. No?
As long as Apache james generating a new uidvalidity number for each instance
of james. I'm assuming it is a random number.
The client should see the new uidvalidity and
On 8/17/2012 3:57 PM, tim wrote:
does it ever change or is it they same always?
I wonder if it is a guid random number, if the client's matches it assumes the
backing database has not be refreshed.
On Aug 17, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Joshua Armstrong wrote:
Each mailbox (folder) has a UIDVALIDITY va
does it ever change or is it they same always?
I wonder if it is a guid random number, if the client's matches it assumes the
backing database has not be refreshed.
On Aug 17, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Joshua Armstrong wrote:
> On 8/17/2012 3:02 PM, tim wrote:
>> Do you know if the standard imap client
On 8/17/2012 3:02 PM, tim wrote:
Do you know if the standard imap client does a get of uids of the message index?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501
says there is a uid command.
if the client does, the hash thing probably should work, even if the messages
are in different orders?
-tim
A
On 8/17/2012 3:02 PM, tim wrote:
Do you know if the standard imap client does a get of uids of the message index?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501
says there is a uid command.
if the client does, the hash thing probably should work, even if the messages
are in different orders?
-tim
On 8/17/2012 3:02 PM, tim wrote:
Do you know if the standard imap client does a get of uids of the message index?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501
says there is a uid command.
if the client does, the hash thing probably should work, even if the messages
are in different orders?
-tim
A
On 8/17/2012 3:02 PM, tim wrote:
Do you know if the standard imap client does a get of uids of the message index?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501
says there is a uid command.
if the client does, the hash thing probably should work, even if the messages
are in different orders?
-tim
T
Do you know if the standard imap client does a get of uids of the message index?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501
says there is a uid command.
if the client does, the hash thing probably should work, even if the messages
are in different orders?
-tim
On Aug 17, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Joshua Arm
On 8/17/2012 2:48 PM, tim wrote:
are your servers completely separate, or could they share a database? (guid
-> imap id)
On Aug 17, 2012, at 3:46 PM, tim wrote:
It's a possibility. We're exploring options right now and that's one
option. I'm not up on the details though of the database
On 8/17/2012 2:46 PM, tim wrote:
and the imap client probably does a similar:
for (int i=messagesIhaveRecieved;i Yes. That's why the first thing an IMAP client when you ask it
to "get a folder/mailbox" is download a list of messages from the
server. I have tcpdump output confirming that a s
are your servers completely separate, or could they share a database? (guid
-> imap id)
On Aug 17, 2012, at 3:46 PM, tim wrote:
> and the imap client probably does a similar:
>
> for (int i=messagesIhaveRecieved;i {
> //blahblahblah
> }
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 17, 2012, at 3:41 PM, tim wrote:
and the imap client probably does a similar:
for (int i=messagesIhaveRecieved;i ah i see
>
> On Aug 17, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Joshua Armstrong wrote:
>
>> On 8/17/2012 2:29 PM, tim wrote:
>>> So this:
>>>
>>>/**
>>> * Method createMail creates a new Mail.
>>> *
>>> * @param message
ah i see
On Aug 17, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Joshua Armstrong wrote:
> On 8/17/2012 2:29 PM, tim wrote:
>> So this:
>>
>> /**
>> * Method createMail creates a new Mail.
>> *
>> * @param message
>> * @param recipient
>> * @return Mail
>> * @throws MessagingException
>>
On 8/17/2012 2:39 PM, tim wrote:
wait, are imap ids integers or uuid strings?
-tim
integers
--
Joshua M. Armstrong
Software Engineer
Centurion, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For add
wait, are imap ids integers or uuid strings?
-tim
On Aug 17, 2012, at 3:30 PM, tim wrote:
> Or no, that's a static getId, that can't be right.
>
> On Aug 17, 2012, at 3:29 PM, tim wrote:
>
>> So this:
>>
>>/**
>> * Method createMail creates a new Mail.
>> *
>> * @param messag
On 8/17/2012 2:29 PM, tim wrote:
So this:
/**
* Method createMail creates a new Mail.
*
* @param message
* @param recipient
* @return Mail
* @throws MessagingException
*/
protected Mail createMail(MimeMessage message, MailAddress recipient)
th
Or no, that's a static getId, that can't be right.
On Aug 17, 2012, at 3:29 PM, tim wrote:
> So this:
>
> /**
> * Method createMail creates a new Mail.
> *
> * @param message
> * @param recipient
> * @return Mail
> * @throws MessagingException
> */
> p
So this:
/**
* Method createMail creates a new Mail.
*
* @param message
* @param recipient
* @return Mail
* @throws MessagingException
*/
protected Mail createMail(MimeMessage message, MailAddress recipient)
throws MessagingException, UnknownHostExcepti
On 8/17/2012 2:08 PM, tim wrote:
have you found where in the code james is doing the imap storage?
i might need to do this as well at some later date.
I believe I have, yes. Mainly in the
org.apache.james.fetchmail.FolderProcessor class. It imports all the
mechanics from javax.mail and
have you found where in the code james is doing the imap storage?
i might need to do this as well at some later date.
On Aug 17, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Joshua Armstrong wrote:
> On 8/17/2012 1:48 PM, tim wrote:
>> do the UIDs need to be sequential for imap?
>>
>> could you hash on the messages' uni
On 8/17/2012 1:48 PM, tim wrote:
do the UIDs need to be sequential for imap?
could you hash on the messages' unique id header, or the message itself?
-tim
(i'm not affiliated with Apache James, just thoughts)
On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Joshua Armstrong wrote:
That's what we were thinking
do the UIDs need to be sequential for imap?
could you hash on the messages' unique id header, or the message itself?
-tim
(i'm not affiliated with Apache James, just thoughts)
On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Joshua Armstrong wrote:
> Hi, James users.
>
> My company is using James to handle voic
Hi, James users.
My company is using James to handle voicemail storage and retrieval and
would like to have a multiple server scenario where users can access
their messages from either server. We wanted to use IMAP to keep mail
synchronized between the servers but we're running to a problem w
27 matches
Mail list logo
