Re: Branch Differences between 2_1_fcs and trunk

2005-05-22 Thread apache
> > I see there are still 3 references to avalon components: > > AvalonMailStore, AvalonUserStore, filepair/RepositoryManager > > Still? Noel, I sent the message you're relplying to on April, the 6th. Now I see that: Composable interface is still used in RepositoryManager, UsersLDAPRepository,

RE: Branch Differences between 2_1_fcs and trunk

2005-05-22 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Will the new version run under Loom? I don't know. Hopefully so, but someone would have to test that and report back. > - trunk has some experimental changes that won't be kept. > I've seen there is a lot of code change to move from avalon Components > (Deprecated) t

RE: Branch Differences

2005-04-06 Thread Alan Gerhard
> I think this is what Noel intended with his "Merger Branch" > message to the > server-dev list few days ago. > I understood he is already working on the big "merging" work > so we'll have > un updated trunk (head) to work on. > Yes, I realize that ... I am still trying to get a sense of if this

Re: Branch Differences

2005-04-04 Thread apache
> Noel, we have two branches and two major versions. > I am sure the difficulty in maintaining these difference been > discussed. > Is there any consensus in making the migration of > branch_2_1_fcs into trunk > a priority ?? I think this is what Noel intended with his "Merger Branch" message to