Re: Webmail access

2005-05-13 Thread Emre Sokullu
until the IMAP > >functionality is more complete and stable. > > > >Many thanks, > > > >Nathan > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: 10 May 2005 15:01 > >To: Nathan Day > >Cc: gener

RE: Webmail access

2005-05-11 Thread Tony Freeman @ TeamXL
neral@james.apache.org Subject: RE: Webmail access Hi Nathan, Just as a matter of protocol it's better to ask these sort of questions on the server-user@james.apache.org mailing list as you'll get a lot more feedback on what people are using for webmail. As regards IMAP; there is not enough f

Re: Webmail access

2005-05-11 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
c: general@james.apache.org Subject: RE: Webmail access Hi Nathan, Just as a matter of protocol it's better to ask these sort of questions on the server-user@james.apache.org mailing list as you'll get a lot more feedback on what people are using for webmail. As regards IMAP; there is not enough

RE: Webmail access

2005-05-11 Thread Victor Martinez Conte
athan -Original Message- From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 May 2005 15:01 To: Nathan Day Cc: general@james.apache.org Subject: RE: Webmail access Hi Nathan, Just as a matter of protocol it's better to ask these sort of questions on the server-user@james.apache.org ma