Might just do that. Thanks for the comment on the config files.
Guess i can wait a week!
Daniel.
> -Original Message-
> From: bill page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 May 2004 03:30
> To: 'James Users List'
> Subject: RE: Which james version to use
>
I recently move from 2.1.3 and don't have any problems. I'd recommend
merging the old config into the new one rather than the other way around.
OTOH if you can wait, maybe the release will come out this week.
bill
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent
> 2.1.3 has been 100% stable for me, and i have seen loads
> of errors on the list regarding 2.2.0!
Looked at what has been fixed in James 2.2.0 that was broken in James 2.1.3.
My take would be that most of the issues related to the James 2.2.0 release
condidates related to reducing the use of J
