Hi Mark,
JAMES will accept emails to invalid users in a domain hosted by the server,
but send a bounce back to the sender and drop the email to the deadletter
repos.So no need to worry
Cheers,
Norman
2008/9/18 Mark Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> All,
>
> I am working on my mail sever to make sure i
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
The "local-address-error" processor is configured to bounce any mail
addressed to not available users, to notify the postmaster and to put
them in the address-error repository.
Your logs, as Vincenzo already recognized, just tell the same thing.
If you don't want to see th
The "local-address-error" processor is configured to bounce any mail
addressed to not available users, to notify the postmaster and to put
them in the address-error repository.
Your logs, as Vincenzo already recognized, just tell the same thing.
If you don't want to see the bounce mail after the i
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Jay Lowe wrote:
Sorry to repeat this question.. I've never seen a simple answer to this
problem (if it is a problem). It looks like I'm an open relay.
I have my config.xml set for true
and 192.168.1.3/255.255.255.0, my.fixed
ip.address (my.fixed.ip.address replaced with
The first case shown in your log looks like there was a message sent to
a wrong address, hence stored in "db://maildb/deadletter/address-error"
and after that bounced back to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Could it be? It would
not be an open relay but normal operations.
Also the second looks the same,
Jay Lowe wrote:
> Sorry to repeat this question.. I've never seen a simple answer to this
> problem (if it is a problem). It looks like I'm an open relay.
> I have my config.xml set for true
> and 192.168.1.3/255.255.255.0, my.fixed
> ip.address (my.fixed.ip.address replaced with the
> real addre
TECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: James Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Open relay
> >Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 16:02:25 -0700
> >
> >last i checked, james was not configured as an open relay by defaul
List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Open relay
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 16:02:25 -0700
last i checked, james was not configured as an open relay by default. ask
your isp to show you the e-mail that they successfully relayed through
it--me thinks they are confusing *accepting* a message with
last i checked, james was not configured as an open relay by default. ask your
isp to show you the e-mail that they successfully relayed through it--me thinks
they are confusing *accepting* a message with *relaying* a message--james
accepts everything, but only passes on what makes it through th
I don't believe it will. I put up James in the fall (had an expired server
and dreaded re-installing exchange). I was concerned about this too. I
went to www.ordb.org to have it tested and it passed. My firewall is set to
accept from anywhere and send to anywhere but only from the one ip (which
> > However, I see a growing concern amongst my peers for
> > the "open-relay" thing. I want to inquire that, can
> > JAMES be possibly listed in the blacklists (ORDB, MAPS
> > etc.).
>
> > I m asking because JAMES accepts the messages from ANY
> > IP address.
>
> AFAIK any *legitimate* relay serve
AFAIK any *legitimate* relay server REQUIRES that a relay actually occur.
james--unless configured incorrectly--doesn't fit that profile.
heck, if you are paranoid about such thing (i am), here is a cron job for you
(requires wget):
#!/bin/sh
# wjp last updated 8/26/03
# first we query the rbls
12 matches
Mail list logo
