Hi,
I test the "apache-jspf-resolver-1.0.3.jar" with newest source code and had the
same problem. After some time I fund a solution.
I changed the class "org.apache.james.jspf.impl.SPF".
In the constructor I changed the "executor" form "AsynchronousSPFExecutor" to
"SynchronousSPFExecutor" and
hi Gunter
>And yes, by other domains all works fine.
Google sucks :-)
--
David Matthews
m...@dmatthews.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@ja
Hi,
> And yes, by other domains all works fine.
sorry, after wrote, the next problem with "myfritz.net":
DNS: v=spf1 ip4:212.42.244.0/24 ip6:2001:bf0:244::/48 -all
I think it's a james-problem.
The problems is with incoming mails, I recieve the mails an can read it without
problems.
Best wi
Hi David,
That's ironic: because of a hint from my provider to set up SPF to be on the
safe side (because of Google!), I dealt with the topic.
And now, of all people, should Google not be configured properly? It would be
possible.
The warning isn't really a problem, I can receiv
Hi David,
That's ironic: because of a hint from my provider to set up SPF to be on the
safe side (because of Google!), I dealt with the topic.
And now, of all people, should Google not be configured properly? It would be
possible.
The warning isn't really a problem, I can receiv
>I'm using the spf-mailet now and test it. I found this warning in the log file:
>"No SPF record found for host: googlemail.com"
>
>So I checked "googlemail.com" by mxtoolbox.com
>DNS-Record: v=spf1 redirect=_spf.google.com
Obvious things first - does yo
Hi,
I'm using the spf-mailet now and test it. I found this warning in the log file:
"No SPF record found for host: googlemail.com"
So I checked "googlemail.com" by mxtoolbox.com
DNS-Record: v=spf1 redirect=_spf.google.com
The Tool found not any problems. Somebody know
lot from the advice given last
time, so thank you again for that and other people who have help.
Sincerely, Jason
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: cryptearth
Sent: 17 July 2019 19:42
To: server-user@james.apache.org
Subject: Re: Applying JDKIM and SPF to the Mailets
Hey Jason,
in no way I
lot from the advice given last
time, so thank you again for that and other people who have help.
Sincerely, Jason
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: cryptearth
Sent: 17 July 2019 19:42
To: server-user@james.apache.org
Subject: Re: Applying JDKIM and SPF to the Mailets
Hey Jason,
in no way I
: cryptearth
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 7:42 PM
To: server-user@james.apache.org
Subject: Re: Applying JDKIM and SPF to the Mailets
Hey Jason,
in no way I meant to critize or offend you - I just gave you an honest
reply how I "felt" when I read your notes.
Yes, it's not perfect, a
: cryptearth
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 7:42 PM
To: server-user@james.apache.org
Subject: Re: Applying JDKIM and SPF to the Mailets
Hey Jason,
in no way I meant to critize or offend you - I just gave you an honest
reply how I "felt" when I read your notes.
Yes, it's not perfect, a
and the response. I will try to
put it into good use. Sorry for any wrong word.
Since this thread is more about DKIM and SPF, I might have to stop replying
after this as to not go off-topic and created a new one if needed.
Sincerely, Jason
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: cryptearth
Sent:
Sorry for any wrong word.
Since this thread is more about DKIM and SPF, I might have to stop replying
after this as to not go off-topic and created a new one if needed.
Sincerely, Jason
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: cryptearth
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 5:01 PM
To: server
Sorry for any wrong word.
Since this thread is more about DKIM and SPF, I might have to stop replying
after this as to not go off-topic and created a new one if needed.
Sincerely, Jason
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: cryptearth
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 5:01 PM
To: server
its maybe a personal note on how you did it - but it's not
really useable as "general tutorial", wich is covered on apache itself.
You only combined a few things like setting up SPF and adding DKIM to a
normal James setup.
Matt
Am 17.07.2019 um 11:21 schrieb Jason Tjankilisa
information as general as it can be. any Comment/Critique are
welcome !
Thank you for the help and response.
Sincerely, Jason.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: cryptearth
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:55 PM
To: server-user@james.apache.org
Subject: Re: Applying JDKIM and SPF to the Mailets
information as general as it can be. any Comment/Critique are
welcome !
Thank you for the help and response.
Sincerely, Jason.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: cryptearth
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:55 PM
To: server-user@james.apache.org
Subject: Re: Applying JDKIM and SPF to the Mailets
tepad text file
and im planning to add picture so people wont get confused.For now, I probably
use Google Drive to share the File Text and gonna fix some of the words before
uploading. Its kinda off topic, so apology for that. And with that the topic of
applying JDKIM and SPF is done.
I will rep
confused.For now, I probably
use Google Drive to share the File Text and gonna fix some of the words before
uploading. Its kinda off topic, so apology for that. And with that the topic of
applying JDKIM and SPF is done.
I will reply as soon as possible once the tutorial done. Thank you so much
confused.For now, I probably
use Google Drive to share the File Text and gonna fix some of the words before
uploading. Its kinda off topic, so apology for that. And with that the topic of
applying JDKIM and SPF is done.
I will reply as soon as possible once the tutorial done. Thank you so much
the DNS Record. So I rename the
TXT DKIM and create new public key in the DNS Record and suddenly it works, now
my mail has DKIM and SPF Approval.
I apologize, but apparently the private key used for SSL/TLS are not the same
as the one used in DKIM key, so my bad. That’s what caused the DKI
Hiya Matt,
Last time I check, the selector DKIM didn’t show up either in MXLookup even
though I copy paste the name of the selector to the DNS Record. So I rename the
TXT DKIM and create new public key in the DNS Record and suddenly it works, now
my mail has DKIM and SPF Approval.
I apologize
Hiya Matt,
Last time I check, the selector DKIM didn’t show up either in MXLookup even
though I copy paste the name of the selector to the DNS Record. So I rename the
TXT DKIM and create new public key in the DNS Record and suddenly it works, now
my mail has DKIM and SPF Approval.
I apologize
ifferent? I will make sure to contact my co-worker
After some more testing and experimenting, I finally made some progress. I
Successfully implement SPF (I removed the A and the Include google stuff from
the TXT record just as you said) and it was relatively easy. But for the DKIM
its another whole
will make sure to contact my co-worker
After some more testing and experimenting, I finally made some progress. I
Successfully implement SPF (I removed the A and the Include google stuff from
the TXT record just as you said) and it was relatively easy. But for the DKIM
its another whole story
will make sure to contact my co-worker
After some more testing and experimenting, I finally made some progress. I
Successfully implement SPF (I removed the A and the Include google stuff from
the TXT record just as you said) and it was relatively easy. But for the DKIM
its another whole story
lude:_spf.google.com ~all" - this doesn't seem right.
First: there is A as an IPv4 already set - no need for adding it again.
SPF is designed so if another record(-type) is referenced it has to be
resolved. So, by adding A to SPF this already resolves to
ip4:173.249.33.70 - it should
KZd8VzHBFOGHa4T4ov6oXhX5PuqdFQz7FSuQrzra2xP35cj575vTGWKLo7QSpyZibzvy
nPmWwoM+/3UZbBJStASz2dglpsJZpAn3NTfBAqfRRd/TVmBXlcfeWVvUNpqTUY5oao+m
32iA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
spf=neutral (google.com: 173.249.33.70 is neither permitted nor denied
by best guess record for domain of i...@pc.107.jp
KZd8VzHBFOGHa4T4ov6oXhX5PuqdFQz7FSuQrzra2xP35cj575vTGWKLo7QSpyZibzvy
nPmWwoM+/3UZbBJStASz2dglpsJZpAn3NTfBAqfRRd/TVmBXlcfeWVvUNpqTUY5oao+m
32iA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
spf=neutral (google.com: 173.249.33.70 is neither permitted nor denied
by best guess record for domain of i...@pc.107.jp
Hey Jason,
as said earlier: If Google is marking your mails as spam that's most
likely issue with DNS. Neither DKIM nor SPF is needed, Google uses a
"soft-ignore" policy wich, when no information can be obtained, ignores it.
SPF is set in the zone file belong to your domain,
/anyone tell me what causing this error?
Just a little more and I’ll be able to implement DKIM and SPF to my mail so
finally google don’t take it as spam.
Last time I try to build with the mvn clean install ( Following this
https://nozaki.me/roller/kyle/entry/configuring-james-to-sign-dkim ), the
/anyone tell me what causing this error?
Just a little more and I’ll be able to implement DKIM and SPF to my mail so
finally google don’t take it as spam.
Last time I try to build with the mvn clean install ( Following this
https://nozaki.me/roller/kyle/entry/configuring-james-to-sign-dkim ), the
t; library.
> I also downloaded this jar files http://www.badpenguin.co.uk/dkim/ and put it
> on james/lib and nothing works also.
>
> For the SPF I there;s already one inside james/lib folder named :
> apache-jspf-resolver-1.0.1.jar so I guess I don’t need to find for SPF
> li
and nothing works also.
For the SPF I there;s already one inside james/lib folder named :
apache-jspf-resolver-1.0.1.jar so I guess I don’t need to find for SPF library
and just use it in the mailetcontainer.xml as you mentioned it in the last mail
(haven’t tried since it since I didn’t found anyth
and nothing works also.
For the SPF I there;s already one inside james/lib folder named :
apache-jspf-resolver-1.0.1.jar so I guess I don’t need to find for SPF library
and just use it in the mailetcontainer.xml as you mentioned it in the last mail
(haven’t tried since it since I didn’t found anyth
Hello,
I have just installed the 3.0-SNAPSHOT on a test server I have, in order
to test the IMAP and SPF functionality.
I am not able yet to start the server with IMAP enabled, because I get
some errors. But I will try to work on this in the next days. I know
that some other people have similar
Doh! In my haste to respond I completely overlooked the fact you were
talking about SPF and not Bayesian Analysis ;-)
David Legg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MessageIsSpamProbability
false
Regards,
David Legg
Jerry M wrote:
I'm getting more and more spam that uses one domain for the
header and another domain (typically my own domain) for
the header. I have discovered that the SPF matcher only checks
the domain and ignores the
I'm getting more and more spam that uses one domain for the
header and another domain (typically my own domain) for
the header. I have discovered that the SPF matcher only checks
the domain and ignores the domain. It would seem
to me that if only one header domain is checked, it
Hi Marcel,
I don't think there is anything you need to do to your James server as
such. It looks as if the destination you were trying to send an email
to is a bit over-zealous in its use of SPF.
I can't tell from your message whether the domains mentioned in your
email have b
Hi,
i often get this error:
===
Hi. This is the James mail server at server.watchee.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. Below
I include the list of recipient
Hi Mark,
in your thread dump there is no reference to any of the spf classes.
Why do you think the hang is happening on new SPF()?
Stefano
Mark Hale ha scritto:
On 3/30/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Hale ha scritto:
> Any thoughts on why new SPF() would hang ra
On 3/30/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Hale ha scritto:
> Any thoughts on why new SPF() would hang rather than throw an error?
> I've waited for hours and it doesn't timeout.
Can you take a stack dump of the VM while it's waiting?
If you are
Mark Hale ha scritto:
Any thoughts on why new SPF() would hang rather than throw an error?
I've waited for hours and it doesn't timeout.
Can you take a stack dump of the VM while it's waiting?
If you are on linux you can do this by "kill -3 "
If you use java5 you can
Hi Mark,
is it workin for a while and after an amount of time its hanging ? Any
stacktrace ?
bye
Norman
Mark Hale schrieb:
> Community,
>
> I at one point had jSPF working but now the process hangs when I reach
> the lined of code:
>
> SPF spf = new SPF();
>
> I'
Community,
I at one point had jSPF working but now the process hangs when I reach
the lined of code:
SPF spf = new SPF();
I've updated my dns server ip's in the past week but they are working.
I am not sure if that is the cause, but it was a change.
Any thoughts on why new SPF()
aight on
this? Is SPF support included in James 2.3.0? Is there any configuration
required? Does James just automatically reject mail based on SPF records if
it finds them? Is there any log information generated? Is there some
documentation on this in the James docs that I've overlooke
I bet they want to tell you that you should publish and SPF DNS-Record
for your domain. See http://new.openspf.org for more infos.
bye
Norman
Carl Woodward schrieb:
Hi,
I'm using james as my mail server and reading through the hotmail
guidelines, it says that I should "Authent
Hi,
I'm using james as my mail server and reading through the hotmail
guidelines, it says that I should "Authenticate your outbound mail:
Publish Sender Policy Framework (SPF) records". I have turned on
"authRequired" and "verifyIdentity" but does this mean th
Chris Lindley wrote:
SPF support in James:
Nobody is actively working on it... I think there's some skepticism
about how effective it can be given the sender-rewriting requirement.
Support probably wouldn't hurt though. Or at least instructions on how
to assemble it.
As w
SPF support in James:
Having been victim to spammers spoofing one of our domains, we have now
defined SPF text strings to try and prevent further abuse - though
unfortunately, without a greater take-up through all mail servers on
this technology, spam falsely claiming to be from one of our
> When an email comes in, and it says it's from "aol.com"
> you check the spf record for aol.com. The computer on
> the other end of the line had better be listed in the
> spf record, or it's a spoofed from field
I believe that you mean the RFC 2821 MAIL FRO
> > http://spf.pobox.com/
> - Assuming your mail server supported it, who wouldn't want SPF
> protected turned on?
I consider some things about SPF objectionable. It makes mobile e-mail more
difficult, especially with some loose ends surrounding it. It makes
assumptions lik
tyler wrote:
A full description is here...
http://spf.pobox.com/
Thanks Tyler! Sounds interesting. Couple of questions (for Tyler,
Noel, whoever can answer):
- Assuming your mail server supported it, who wouldn't want SPF
protected turned on?
- Does it have to reject during the
A full description is here...
http://spf.pobox.com/
The basic idea is this. Each domain owner publishes a record in DNS
indicating which servers are allowed to
send email "from" that domain. When an email comes in, and it says it's
from "aol.com" you check the sp
> I might know it by a different term, but can you describe SPF a bit?
See recent discussion on infrastructure@ regarding http://spf.pobox.com.
To answer Tyler's question, there is no support in James, but we'd be
interested in seeing contributions.
tyler wrote:
Now one more question. Does James support SPF (Sender permitted from)
and if not, is there currently a plan to support it? If so, how do you
turn it on?
I might know it by a different term, but can you describe SPF a bit? If
you mean sender permitted based on the From email address
Thanks for all the feedback regarding HSQL, makes much more sense in
that light. Anyway, I like the system a lot, though I still haven't got
it quite
working right, but I will, I think . :-)
Now one more question. Does James support SPF (Sender permitted from)
and if not, is there curren
Anyone have a mailet fo James that uses SPF (http://spf.pobox.com/) records
in DNS?
59 matches
Mail list logo
