Re: XML Virtual User Table n:n mapping

2004-04-22 Thread Eric Weidner
I guess I should have been more clear. The example was trivial. Thinking further, I can see how the regex matcher could suit my needs. Thanks, Eric On Thursday 22 April 2004 01:14 pm, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > class="Forward"> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: XML Virtual User Table n:n mapping

2004-04-22 Thread Noel J. Bergman
>class="Forward"> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I just downloaded 2.2.0RC2 and was looking at the XMLVirtualUserTable but > it doesn't list n:1 or n:n functionality. How does: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@thirddomain.com;[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@thirddo

XML Virtual User Table n:n mapping

2004-04-22 Thread Eric Weidner
I've used the following matcher to provide n:n virtual user mapping for a long time. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] I just downloaded 2.2.0RC2 and was looking at the XMLVirtualUserTable but it doesn't list n:1 or n:n functionality. This ca