hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6909082: Docs warning from java.util.logging.PlatformLoggingMXBean

2009-12-09 Thread mandy . chung
Changeset: 0f8f624ddcb4 Author:mchung Date: 2009-12-09 21:09 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/0f8f624ddcb4 6909082: Docs warning from java.util.logging.PlatformLoggingMXBean Summary: Fix incorrect tag @See with @see. Reviewed-by: darcy ! src/share/classes/java/

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6909057: @see Arrays#hashCode missing particular method specification in j.u.Objects.hash

2009-12-09 Thread joe . darcy
Changeset: c2f83e13bbe5 Author:darcy Date: 2009-12-09 17:55 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/c2f83e13bbe5 6909057: @see Arrays#hashCode missing particular method specification in j.u.Objects.hash Reviewed-by: ksrini ! src/share/classes/java/util/Objects.java

Re: Need reviewers, jdk7 testing changes

2009-12-09 Thread Joe Darcy
Kelly O'Hair wrote: Martin Buchholz wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 16:42, Kelly O'Hair wrote: In theory, the process is supposed to prevent regression test failures from ever creeping in - that's the whole point. When they do (inevitably) creep in, they are supposed to be aggressively targe

What to do about jvmti.h

2009-12-09 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Concerning: 6784084: jvmti.h created during the build differs from file in jdk repo and should not Several issues here, all need to be solved. 1. The jdk repository manages a copy of the hotspot generated file jvmti.h 2. The jdk Makefile sanity checks are trying to verify that the copy of jv

Re: Need reviewers, jdk7 testing changes

2009-12-09 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Martin Buchholz wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 16:42, Kelly O'Hair wrote: In theory, the process is supposed to prevent regression test failures from ever creeping in - that's the whole point. When they do (inevitably) creep in, they are supposed to be aggressively targeted. A gatekeeper demon

Re: Allow Java's ELF symtab reader to use separate debuginfo files

2009-12-09 Thread Andrew Haley
Kelly O'Hair wrote: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: >> 2009/12/9 Andrew Haley : >>> This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541548 >>> The symptom is that jmap doesn't work because target libraries are stripped. >>> The fix is to allow the symtab reader to use the separate debuginfo files >

Re: Allow Java's ELF symtab reader to use separate debuginfo files

2009-12-09 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/12/9 Andrew Haley : > Andrew John Hughes wrote: >> 2009/12/9 Andrew Haley : >>> This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541548 >>> The symptom is that jmap doesn't work because target libraries are stripped. >>> The fix is to allow the symtab reader to use the separate debuginfo fi

Re: Allow Java's ELF symtab reader to use separate debuginfo files

2009-12-09 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Andrew John Hughes wrote: 2009/12/9 Andrew Haley : This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541548 The symptom is that jmap doesn't work because target libraries are stripped. The fix is to allow the symtab reader to use the separate debuginfo files that are available for all (AFAIK)

Re: Allow Java's ELF symtab reader to use separate debuginfo files

2009-12-09 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew John Hughes wrote: > 2009/12/9 Andrew Haley : >> This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541548 >> The symptom is that jmap doesn't work because target libraries are stripped. >> The fix is to allow the symtab reader to use the separate debuginfo files >> that are available for a

Re: Allow Java's ELF symtab reader to use separate debuginfo files

2009-12-09 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/12/9 Andrew Haley : > This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541548 > The symptom is that jmap doesn't work because target libraries are stripped. > The fix is to allow the symtab reader to use the separate debuginfo files > that are available for all (AFAIK) GNU/Linux distributio