hg: jdk7/tl/langtools: 6909538: Clarify meaning of "element" in javax.lang.model.element API

2009-12-10 Thread joe . darcy
Changeset: ff823a039e16 Author:darcy Date: 2009-12-10 20:35 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/ff823a039e16 6909538: Clarify meaning of "element" in javax.lang.model.element API Reviewed-by: ahe ! src/share/classes/javax/lang/model/element/package-info.java

Re: Need reviewers - 3 bugs

2009-12-10 Thread Tim Bell
David Holmes - Sun Microsystems wrote: > Thanks now I see what went wrong - Tims' fault :) I copied: > > watch-serviceability-other at bugs.openjdk.net > > but the above should have said > > watch-serviceability-other at bugs.openjdk.java.net Sorry about that! I couldn't copy the text off my E

Re: Need reviewers - 3 bugs

2009-12-10 Thread David Holmes - Sun Microsystems
Thanks now I see what went wrong - Tims' fault :) I copied: watch-serviceability-other at bugs.openjdk.net but the above should have said watch-serviceability-other at bugs.openjdk.java.net Now it works! But I wish it took wildcards :( Thanks, David Kelly O'Hair said the following on 12/11/0

Re: Need reviewers - 3 bugs

2009-12-10 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Brad had to physically demonstrate this to me, I thought maybe I had some kind of brain injury or something for not understanding it. :^( Anyway, go to the "New" bug and you can see the components, click on a component and it will show you who the component is assigned to, e.g. watch-serviceabili

Re: Need reviewers - 3 bugs

2009-12-10 Thread David Holmes - Sun Microsystems
I can't get it to work. Where are the "components" listed? Even watch-serviceability-other reported "did not match anything" :( Otherwise great info, but I sure wish it was a lot easier to manage. Thanks, David Kelly O'Hair said the following on 12/11/09 09:28: Thanks Tim. Brad just explained

Re: Need reviewers - 3 bugs

2009-12-10 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Thanks Tim. Brad just explained this to me. I'm setup to watch serviceability and build bugs now. -kto Tim Bell wrote: Kelly O'Hair wrote: How could I at least see some email on these bugs? Aren't they connected to the various openjdk email aliases? Sorry I'm not bugzilla-savy. :^( Visit

Re: Need reviewers - 3 bugs

2009-12-10 Thread Tim Bell
Kelly O'Hair wrote: > How could I at least see some email on these bugs? > Aren't they connected to the various openjdk email aliases? > > Sorry I'm not bugzilla-savy. :^( Visit http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/ and log into your bugzilla account (Sun employee logins are probably firstname.lastn...@

Re: Need reviewers - 3 bugs

2009-12-10 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Andrew John Hughes wrote: 2009/11/18 Kelly O'Hair : Need a reviewer. The jhat change is from keith.rand...@gmail.com. I wasn't able to come up with a testcase for that change. The other two just fix a couple of broken tests and remove them from the ProblemList. 6892742: Improve root set use

Re: Need reviewers - 3 bugs

2009-12-10 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/11/18 Kelly O'Hair : > > Need a reviewer. > > The jhat change is from keith.rand...@gmail.com. I wasn't able to > come up with a testcase for that change. > > The other two just fix a couple of broken tests and remove them from > the ProblemList. > > 6892742: Improve root set used by jhat > 69

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 4891262: API spec, javax/accessibility: few invalid javadoc tags

2009-12-10 Thread joe . darcy
Changeset: aa0d374b40a5 Author:darcy Date: 2009-12-10 13:28 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/aa0d374b40a5 4891262: API spec, javax/accessibility: few invalid javadoc tags Reviewed-by: jjg ! src/share/classes/javax/accessibility/AccessibleContext.java ! src/shar

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6909070: Missing package statements in java.text.Bidi @see links

2009-12-10 Thread joe . darcy
Changeset: f9c9c2b726a0 Author:darcy Date: 2009-12-10 13:04 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/f9c9c2b726a0 6909070: Missing package statements in java.text.Bidi @see links Reviewed-by: anthony ! src/share/classes/java/text/Bidi.java

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 2 new changesets

2009-12-10 Thread christopher . hegarty
Changeset: ae944611249f Author:chegar Date: 2009-12-10 15:52 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/ae944611249f 6909089: Memory leak occurs by lack of free for read buffer in SocketInputStream#read() Reviewed-by: alanb, jccollet ! src/windows/native/java/net/Socket

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 2 new changesets

2009-12-10 Thread sean . mullan
Changeset: 7c9be6c9385a Author:mullan Date: 2009-12-10 11:31 -0500 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/7c9be6c9385a 6867348: Digest Value of References inside Manifest - calculation order problem Reviewed-by: xuelei ! src/share/classes/org/jcp/xml/dsig/internal/dom/DOMX

Re: Allow Java's ELF symtab reader to use separate debuginfo files

2009-12-10 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: > Kelly O'Hair wrote: >> Is there some other way than baking in 256 hex constants into our sources? > > I'm sure it's perfectly possible to generate the CRC-32 tables at runtime. > However, the CRC function is defined in terms of this exact source code, Ah, I was about to add