Hi Holmes,
Thank you for your answer, I just like to clarify my question and your answer
so far,
public void put(long n){
try{
lock.lock();
obj.put(n);
}
finally { lock.unlock();}
}
}
The obj.put(n) statement may involve with other methods within object obj,
and those method may i
Not sure why you sent this to serviceability-dev as this has nothing to
do with the JDK/JVM serviceability APIs
On 21/12/2011 4:32 PM, Lee Ming wrote:
> Currently We are developing a system that requires a lot of usages of
> Java concurrency. There seem to be some
> concurrent bugs in our system.
Hi everyone,
Currently We are developing a system that requires a lot of usages of Java
concurrency. There seem to be some
concurrent bugs in our system. Thus I just wonder about the following usage of
lock
class Test{
private final PInfo obj = new PInfo();
private ReentrantLock lock =
Looks good, except that the LocalVariableTable attribute comments in
write_code_attribute() and write_local_variable_table_attribute() don't
match. The comment in the latter says "LineNumberTable" instead
of "LocalVariableTable" and the descriptor is for the line number table
rather than the loca
Hi!
I'd like to resend my request for review and kindly ask for a review for
my patch that fixes bug number 7064927.
The webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/7064927/
Thanks, thomas
On 14.11.2011 12:18, Thomas Wuerthinger wrote:
Hi!
An open webrev of the patch that f
CCC request has already been submitted and approved.
I should have mention that in the RFR.
Fred
On 12/20/11 12:55 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Does this need CCC approval? This is non-normative text providing
information only so I think it is okay without CCC - but someone else
should confirm that.
Does this need CCC approval? This is non-normative text providing
information only so I think it is okay without CCC - but someone else
should confirm that.
David
On 20/12/2011 9:16 PM, Frederic Parain wrote:
A simple change in the javadoc of
java.lang.management.ManagementPermission to make
Changeset: 6c995c08526c
Author:phh
Date: 2011-12-19 15:50 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/6c995c08526c
7122880: Extend vendor-specific command interface to include manageable switches
Summary: Add Flag::external_ext()/writable_ext(), both return fals
A simple change in the javadoc of
java.lang.management.ManagementPermission to make more
explicit the fact that the "control" permission can
also allow disclosure of information about the application.
Webrev is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fparain/7120974/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Fred
--
Frede
