Changeset: 93ca9cbc8940
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-04-05 13:05 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/93ca9cbc8940
Added tag jdk8-b33 for changeset 78cea258caab
! .hgtags
Changeset: 100b6c2f75ba
Author:rupashka
Date: 2012-03-22 17:10 +0200
URL: http:/
Changeset: bc8881f974b8
Author:jcoomes
Date: 2012-03-23 22:34 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/hotspot/rev/bc8881f974b8
7156659: new hotspot build - hs24-b06
Reviewed-by: johnc
! make/hotspot_version
Changeset: 1139f6b1cbd4
Author:jcoomes
Date: 2012-03-20 19:
Changeset: b3cad5619239
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-04-05 13:04 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxws/rev/b3cad5619239
Added tag jdk8-b33 for changeset ea80b2388dce
! .hgtags
Changeset: e4241f09e2b6
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-04-05 13:05 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/e4241f09e2b6
Added tag jdk8-b33 for changeset 46831c72b7f6
! .hgtags
Changeset: 517f0789bd4e
Author:lana
Date: 2012-04-09 21:58 -0700
URL: http
Changeset: 06ef0b4daa4c
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-04-05 13:04 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/rev/06ef0b4daa4c
Added tag jdk8-b33 for changeset 42f275168fa5
! .hgtags
Changeset: 3b70add6ae45
Author:lana
Date: 2012-04-09 21:55 -0700
URL: http://hg.open
Changeset: 19d53d500474
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-04-05 13:04 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxp/rev/19d53d500474
Added tag jdk8-b33 for changeset 9bcab2b8b8ea
! .hgtags
Changeset: 0feb9b8a9538
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-04-05 13:04 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/corba/rev/0feb9b8a9538
Added tag jdk8-b33 for changeset 1e2ac1ea3f6c
! .hgtags
FYI...
All dlls in the jdk build should be using /SAFESEH is there some reason that
this dll does not?
-kto
... latest jdk8/build forest build on windows
Checking for /SAFESEH usage in:
C:/jprt/T/P1/160106~1.KOH/s/build/windows-i586/../windows-i586-fastdebug/j2sdk-image/jre/bin/sawindbg.d
Dan,
Thank you.
-Dmitry
On 2012-04-11 01:53, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 4/10/12 3:47 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Dan,
Looks good for me.
Thanks!
1.
239 # If Full Debug Symbols is enabled, then we want the same debug and
240 # optimization flags as used by FASTDEBUG. We also want all
Staffan,
1. MacosxOperatingSystem.c
49 return 0;
Probably it should be -1 here.
NIT: 133 if (gettimeofday(&now, NULL)) {
if (gettimeofday(&now, NULL) < 0) { - IMHO is more readable.
-Dmitry
On 2012-04-03 17:39, Staffan Larsen wrote:
Please review the following fix:
webr
On 4/10/12 2:47 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Dan,
Looks good for me.
1.
239 # If Full Debug Symbols is enabled, then we want the same debug and
240 # optimization flags as used by FASTDEBUG. We also want all the
241 # debug info in one place (-xs).
Sorry! I'm later at the party. What is th
On 4/10/12 3:47 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Dan,
Looks good for me.
Thanks!
1.
239 # If Full Debug Symbols is enabled, then we want the same debug and
240 # optimization flags as used by FASTDEBUG. We also want all the
241 # debug info in one place (-xs).
Sorry! I'm later at the party.
Dan,
Looks good for me.
1.
239 # If Full Debug Symbols is enabled, then we want the same debug and
240 # optimization flags as used by FASTDEBUG. We also want all the
241 # debug info in one place (-xs).
Sorry! I'm later at the party. What is the reason of enforcing certain
optimization l
Thanks Serguei!
Dan
On 4/10/12 2:51 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Dan,
It is good.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 4/9/12 1:51 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Greetings,
Coming soon to a JDK repo near you! Full Debug Symbols!
OK, to just a subset of libraries and programs... on Linux and
Sola
Dan,
It is good.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 4/9/12 1:51 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Greetings,
Coming soon to a JDK repo near you! Full Debug Symbols!
OK, to just a subset of libraries and programs... on Linux and Solaris...
If you're a Windows fan, the JDK repo has had Full Debug Symbols support
Staffan, Roger,
There isn't any undocumented semantics other than what the specification
for com.sun.management.OperatingSystemMXBean specifies (that is
indicated by its method name):
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/jre/api/management/extension/index.html
As Roger suggests, you can d
Kelly,
As always, thanks for filling in the history!
I think I'll stick with changing as a little as possible, but
I will add the comments that I mentioned below...
Dan
On 4/10/12 11:39 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Keep in mind that Release.gmk has been edited by many many people and I suspect
t
Keep in mind that Release.gmk has been edited by many many people and I suspect
there are dozens
and dozens of various bugs in utilities, make itself, the systems being used,
shell behaviors, etc.
that some of this make logic could be working around. I have tried to get
people to document that
i
Staffan,
I reviewed it and I think it looks OK. I tried looking at the code
in MacosxOperatingSystem.c relative to the Linux version, but I think
it is easily possible to miss something subtle here.
You might try a direct ping to Mandy Chung since M&M was her area.
You might also try a direct pi
On 4/10/12 7:54 AM, keith mcguigan wrote:
Hi Dan,
I think it looks good.
Thanks!
The new form of the 'find' commands in Release.gmk could use a
comment, though. It took me a few minutes to realize that EXE_SUFFIX
was empty for linux/solaris -- it looks like there's a redundancy in
the l
Changeset: eec133f2406a
Author:jfranck
Date: 2012-04-10 10:45 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/eec133f2406a
7158930: (ann) library support for repeating annotations is not built when
compiling the JDK
Reviewed-by: ohair, erikj
! make/java/java/reflect/Makefile
Changeset: 10c12fb36ed2
Author:sla
Date: 2012-04-05 14:16 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/10c12fb36ed2
7133111: libsaproc debug print should be printed as unsigned long to fit large
numbers on 64bit platform
Reviewed-by: dcubed, mgronlun, dsamersoff
Looks good! (Although I wish there was a better way to write code like this).
/Staffan
On 10 apr 2012, at 15:50, Frederic Parain wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> This is a request for review for CR
> 7148497: javax.management.MBeanAttributeInfo.hashCode throws
> NullPointerException
> http://bugs.sun.c
Hi Dan,
I think it looks good. The new form of the 'find' commands in Release.gmk could
use a comment, though. It took me a few minutes to realize that EXE_SUFFIX was
empty for linux/solaris -- it looks like there's a redundancy in the logic (both
NOT name *.debuginfo AND name *.exe). I s
Greetings,
This is a request for review for CR
7148497: javax.management.MBeanAttributeInfo.hashCode throws
NullPointerException
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7148497
Even if the initial CR only refers to MBeanAttributeInfo.hashCode(),
the problem is not limited to the MBe
Changeset: fb52e8bd3718
Author:mgronlun
Date: 2012-04-10 10:32 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/fb52e8bd3718
7154809: JDI: update JDI/JDB debugee commandline option parsing
Summary: update debugee commandline parsing
Reviewed-by: dcubed, dsamersoff, sla
! src/s
Any takers for this review? (added core-libs-dev as well)
Thanks,
/Staffan
On 3 apr 2012, at 15:39, Staffan Larsen wrote:
> Please review the following fix:
>
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/7147848/webrev.00/
> bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7147848
>
> This
27 matches
Mail list logo
