Hi Dmitry,
Besides David's suggestion, I don't see the @run main tag for the test,
is it optional?
Thanks a lot!
On 05/06/2012 08:30 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
David,
Thank you for your response!
On 2012-05-06 16:18, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Sorry for late response but I've been
On 05/07/2012 10:55 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 7/05/2012 5:21 PM, Rickard Bäckman wrote:
David,
I can't find that code in any of the modified files (only as blue text
in osThread_bsd.hpp, but that is removed code).
Sorry the frames view of the webrev confused me. It is blue but that
is
Hi, Mandy,
the client part of the fix looks fine. Let me ask a naive question, though.
From your explanation, I see that System.loadLibrary() is now aware of
modules. What prevents us to change LoadLibraryAction the same way?
FROM code looks much more elegant than the new (the old?) TO one.
Thanks a lot, Alan.
I'll go to serviceability-dev list for further discussion.
Best regards!
- Jonathan Lu
On 05/02/2012 04:36 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 02/05/2012 09:27, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi build-dev,
I've got a minor change to fix an invalid path from README.txt of
MemoryMonitor
On 4/05/2012 6:26 PM, Nils Loodin wrote:
Updated this with pulling out some shared code to os_posix.cpp.
Some methods were different enough that this wasn't possible though.
Do you like this better?
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nloodin/7165755/webrev.00/
I don't see any os_posix.cpp
