Re: URGENT code review request for Solaris FDS fix (7175255)

2012-06-19 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
On 6/19/12 10:36 PM, David Holmes wrote: On 20/06/2012 2:32 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: That all said, it still seems to me that the logic for GENERATED is not correct if you have done a cd into the 64 subdirectory. Exactly the opposite is true. Without the TOPDIR/GENERATED combo, when you

Re: URGENT code review request for Solaris FDS fix (7175255)

2012-06-19 Thread David Holmes
On 20/06/2012 2:32 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: That all said, it still seems to me that the logic for GENERATED is not correct if you have done a cd into the 64 subdirectory. Exactly the opposite is true. Without the TOPDIR/GENERATED combo, when you "cd 64", the "../generated" that the GENER

Re: URGENT code review request for Solaris FDS fix (7175255)

2012-06-19 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
On 6/19/12 9:37 PM, David Holmes wrote: On 20/06/2012 1:23 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: Thanks for the quick review! You said it was urgent ;-) Yes, but sometimes that still doesn't get me timely reviews. :-) However, you have to be crazy to change HotSpot Makefiles so... can you really bl

Re: URGENT code review request for Solaris FDS fix (7175255)

2012-06-19 Thread David Holmes
On 20/06/2012 1:23 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: Thanks for the quick review! You said it was urgent ;-) On 6/19/12 8:06 PM, David Holmes wrote: It would be nice if the cd into the 64 directory could be handled internally to the link logic rather than occurring at the top-level (I say this

Re: URGENT code review request for Solaris FDS fix (7175255)

2012-06-19 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
TOPDIR is also used in other HotSpot Makefiles so my usage here is consistent. Dan On 6/19/12 8:51 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote: And TOPDIR might be a variable used in the top level JDK Makefiles, referring to the top of the forest. :^( So the TOPDIR name needs to be more unique I think. -kto On

Re: URGENT code review request for Solaris FDS fix (7175255)

2012-06-19 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Thanks for the quick review! On 6/19/12 8:06 PM, David Holmes wrote: Hi Dan, It would be nice if the cd into the 64 directory could be handled internally to the link logic rather than occurring at the top-level (I say this as someone who will need to hand merge this into another workspace ;

Re: URGENT code review request for Solaris FDS fix (7175255)

2012-06-19 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Thanks for the quick review! On 6/19/12 7:58 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote: 130 ( set -e ; \ 131 cd 64 ; \ 132 $(QUIETLY) $(ADD_GNU_DEBUGLINK) \ 133 $(LIBJVM_DB_DEBUGINFO) $(LIBJVM_DB) ; \ 134 ) Would be better as: 130 ( cd 64&& $(AD

Re: URGENT code review request for Solaris FDS fix (7175255)

2012-06-19 Thread Kelly O'Hair
And TOPDIR might be a variable used in the top level JDK Makefiles, referring to the top of the forest. :^( So the TOPDIR name needs to be more unique I think. -kto On Jun 19, 2012, at 7:06 PM, David Holmes wrote: > Hi Dan, > > It would be nice if the cd into the 64 directory could be handled

Re: URGENT code review request for Solaris FDS fix (7175255)

2012-06-19 Thread David Holmes
Hi Dan, It would be nice if the cd into the 64 directory could be handled internally to the link logic rather than occurring at the top-level (I say this as someone who will need to hand merge this into another workspace ;-) ). Also in make/solaris/makefiles/add_gnu_debuglink.make I don't un

Re: URGENT code review request for Solaris FDS fix (7175255)

2012-06-19 Thread Kelly O'Hair
130 ( set -e ; \ 131 cd 64 ; \ 132 $(QUIETLY) $(ADD_GNU_DEBUGLINK) \ 133 $(LIBJVM_DB_DEBUGINFO) $(LIBJVM_DB) ; \ 134 ) Would be better as: 130 ( cd 64 && $(ADD_GNU_DEBUGLINK) $(LIBJVM_DB_DEBUGINFO) $(LIBJVM_DB) ) And making GENERATED

URGENT code review request for Solaris FDS fix (7175255)

2012-06-19 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Greetings, This is an URGENT code review request for a Solaris specific Full Debug Symbols (FDS) fix. Due to a Makefile logic error, the full debug symbol files and related '_g' symlinks are created in the wrong sub-directory for a couple of the dtrace libraries. The incorrect paths have a double

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7166487: checkSequenceNumber method never called within readRecord of SSLEngineImpl

2012-06-19 Thread xuelei . fan
Changeset: cdcbd22cfb9d Author:xuelei Date: 2012-06-19 17:28 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cdcbd22cfb9d 7166487: checkSequenceNumber method never called within readRecord of SSLEngineImpl Reviewed-by: weijun ! src/share/classes/sun/security/ssl/SSLEngineImp

JEP 158: Unified JVM Logging

2012-06-19 Thread mark . reinhold
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/158 - Mark

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 7177701: error: Filling jar message during javax/imageio/metadata/IIOMetadataFormatImpl compilation

2012-06-19 Thread maurizio . cimadamore
Changeset: 34e254ffd0e7 Author:mcimadamore Date: 2012-06-19 13:25 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/34e254ffd0e7 7177701: error: Filling jar message during javax/imageio/metadata/IIOMetadataFormatImpl compilation Summary: Recent JDK hash changes affected o

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 6901992: InvalidJarIndexException due to bug in sun.misc.JarIndex.merge()

2012-06-19 Thread chris . hegarty
Changeset: efc2791d7c5d Author:chegar Date: 2012-06-19 10:20 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/efc2791d7c5d 6901992: InvalidJarIndexException due to bug in sun.misc.JarIndex.merge() Reviewed-by: chegar Contributed-by: dbel...@gmail.com ! src/share/classes/sun/mi

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 6380549: (rb) ResourceBundle.Control global binding support

2012-06-19 Thread masayoshi . okutsu
Changeset: 4419c8f0b2f2 Author:okutsu Date: 2012-06-19 16:21 +0900 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/4419c8f0b2f2 6380549: (rb) ResourceBundle.Control global binding support Reviewed-by: naoto ! make/java/java/FILES_java.gmk ! src/share/classes/java/util/ResourceBundl