Changeset: 86c563dc70ca
Author:darcy
Date: 2013-01-10 21:12 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/86c563dc70ca
8006062: Add @Repeatable to repeating annotations regression tests in JDK repo
Reviewed-by: jjg
! test/java/lang/annotation/repeatingAnnotations/subpackage
Changeset: 47738fa4d411
Author:dbuck
Date: 2013-01-10 20:26 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxp/rev/47738fa4d411
8003147: port fix for BCEL bug 39695
Summary: Added support for Local Variable Type Table so that BCEL library can
be used to modify methods with generics
Changeset: 45fed5cfd1c3
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-01-10 09:56 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/langtools/rev/45fed5cfd1c3
Added tag jdk8-b72 for changeset 6f0986ed9b7e
! .hgtags
Changeset: c9a914b11436
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-01-10 09:55 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/jdk/rev/c9a914b11436
Added tag jdk8-b72 for changeset 32a57e645e01
! .hgtags
Changeset: c606f644a5d9
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-01-10 09:55 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/jaxws/rev/c606f644a5d9
Added tag jdk8-b72 for changeset d9707230294d
! .hgtags
Changeset: f03f90a4308d
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-01-10 09:55 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/rev/f03f90a4308d
Added tag jdk8-b72 for changeset c1be681d80a1
! .hgtags
Changeset: 84946404d1e1
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-01-10 09:55 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/jaxp/rev/84946404d1e1
Added tag jdk8-b72 for changeset bdf2af722a6b
! .hgtags
Changeset: 191afde59e7b
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-01-10 09:55 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/corba/rev/191afde59e7b
Added tag jdk8-b72 for changeset cb40427f4714
! .hgtags
Changeset: 1129fb75f611
Author:jjg
Date: 2013-01-10 19:36 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/rev/1129fb75f611
8004834: Add doclint support into javadoc
Reviewed-by: erikj, tbell
! common/makefiles/javadoc/Javadoc.gmk
Changeset: c6e8a518c3cd
Author:jjg
Date: 2013-01-10 19:36 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c6e8a518c3cd
8004834: Add doclint support into javadoc
Reviewed-by: erikj, tbell
! make/docs/Makefile
Changeset: c9308137ad9e
Author:jjg
Date: 2013-01-10 19:37
Changeset: fc4cb1577ad6
Author:jjg
Date: 2013-01-10 19:38 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/fc4cb1577ad6
8004834: Add doclint support into javadoc
Reviewed-by: darcy
! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/doclets/formats/html/ConfigurationImpl.java
! src/share/
Changeset: aefb345d3f5e
Author:acorn
Date: 2013-01-10 17:38 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/aefb345d3f5e
7199207: NPG: Crash in PlaceholderTable::verify after StackOverflow
Summary: Reduce scope of placeholder table entries to improve cleanup
Reviewe
Changeset: 7d2f628f04f1
Author:jjg
Date: 2013-01-10 15:48 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/7d2f628f04f1
8006033: bug in Pretty.toSimpleString
Reviewed-by: darcy
! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/tree/Pretty.java
+ test/tools/javac/tree/PrettySimpleS
Changeset: d462da465da6
Author:jjg
Date: 2013-01-10 14:09 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/d462da465da6
8006037: extra space in javac -help for -J and @ options
Reviewed-by: darcy
! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/main/Option.java
+ test/tools/javac
Changeset: 13ff1089e625
Author:jgish
Date: 2013-01-10 15:09 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/13ff1089e625
8005582: java/lang/Runtime/exec/WinCommand.java intermittent test failures
Summary: Remove file-deletion code at cleanup which conflicts with jtreg cleanup
On 1/10/13 7:20 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Update: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8005472/webrev.04
Thanks for the update.
Note, argv[0] is used before argv.length is checked, so if no args are passed
this gives index out of bounds instead of the usage message.
I see you take pains
Frederic,
Finally getting to a code review. I like the design and the code looks very
clean.
I had a couple of questions please:
1. in the EFP and diagnosticCommand.hpp, why do GC.run and GC. run_finalization
not need any special Java permissions?
Is this backward compatibility with existing w
Changeset: c622df692bfb
Author:bchristi
Date: 2013-01-10 10:21 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c622df692bfb
8005962: TEST_BUG: java/util/Properties/MacJNUEncoding can fail in certain
environments
Summary: Test script now sets LC_ALL, other small changes, reloc
Update: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8005472/webrev.04
On 01/10/2013 09:52 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
> On 1/7/13 3:23 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>> On 01/04/2013 11:37 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>> I suspect it is not hanging because it does not exist, but that some
>>> other windows proces
It is OK for me, thanks for fixing the bug!
Shanliang
Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 01/10/2013 02:18 PM, shanliang wrote:
The weakListener is unnecessary, the test does already the same
verification:
171 Set setForUnreg = listenerMap.get(name);
172 assertTrue("No trace of unre
On 01/10/2013 02:18 PM, shanliang wrote:
> The weakListener is unnecessary, the test does already the same
> verification:
> 171 Set setForUnreg = listenerMap.get(name);
> 172 assertTrue("No trace of unregistered MBean: " + setForUnreg,
> setForUnreg == null);
Addressed.
>
> All
The weakListener is unnecessary, the test does already the same
verification:
171 Set setForUnreg = listenerMap.get(name);
172 assertTrue("No trace of unregistered MBean: " +
setForUnreg, setForUnreg == null);
All other are OK for me.
Shanliang
Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 0
On 01/10/2013 01:09 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
> On 01/10/2013 12:53 PM, shanliang wrote:
>> Instead to wait GC, you can also to wait the
>> MBeanServerNotification.UNREGISTRATION_NOTIFICATION, when you receive
>> it, then your listener must be removed too. Of course this solution is
>
> The pro
On 01/10/2013 12:53 PM, shanliang wrote:
> Instead to wait GC, you can also to wait the
> MBeanServerNotification.UNREGISTRATION_NOTIFICATION, when you receive
> it, then your listener must be removed too. Of course this solution is
The problem is that the *NotificationForwarder implementations sw
Instead to wait GC, you can also to wait the
MBeanServerNotification.UNREGISTRATION_NOTIFICATION, when you receive
it, then your listener must be removed too. Of course this solution is
implementation dependent, but the test is already implementation dependent.
Shanliang
Jaroslav Bachorik wr
On 01/10/2013 10:05 AM, shanliang wrote:
> Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>> On 01/09/2013 03:25 PM, shanliang wrote:
>>
>>> Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>>
On 01/09/2013 02:44 PM, shanliang wrote:
> Let's forget the JMX implementation at first. If an MBean is
> unregist
On 01/10/2013 10:05 AM, shanliang wrote:
> Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>> On 01/09/2013 03:25 PM, shanliang wrote:
>>
>>> Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>>
On 01/09/2013 02:44 PM, shanliang wrote:
> Let's forget the JMX implementation at first. If an MBean is
> unregist
On 1/10/13 12:52 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
The exit status of some of the critical commands (such as the compilations)
isn't checked, so if javac fails for some reason, the test might not report
failure. Instead, some weird error might or might not be reported later (though
one will still see the j
Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 01/09/2013 03:25 PM, shanliang wrote:
Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 01/09/2013 02:44 PM, shanliang wrote:
Let's forget the JMX implementation at first. If an MBean is
unregistered, a user at client side calls "removeNotificationListener"
on the MBean,
On 01/09/2013 03:25 PM, shanliang wrote:
> Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>> On 01/09/2013 02:44 PM, shanliang wrote:
>>
>>> Let's forget the JMX implementation at first. If an MBean is
>>> unregistered, a user at client side calls "removeNotificationListener"
>>> on the MBean, what should happen? if t
On 1/7/13 3:23 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 01/04/2013 11:37 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I suspect it is not hanging because it does not exist, but that some other
windows process has it's hands on it.
This is the stdout file from the server being started up right?
Could the server from a previo
31 matches
Mail list logo
