Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-08 Thread David Holmes
Hi Kumar, This is still dead code in src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/jdi/SunCommandLineLauncher.java String os_arch = System.getProperty("os.arch"); Also: test/java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/lib/solaris-amd64/libLauncher.so I know this already exist but I thought bi

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-08 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Hi David, Staffan, Alan, I have addressed all the issues pointed and some more I found while jprt testing. The updated webrev for jdk is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8020552/webrev.jdk.1/ and the delta webrev since the last review webrev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8024046: Test sun/security/krb5/runNameEquals.sh failed on 7u45 Embedded linux-ppc*

2013-09-08 Thread weijun . wang
Changeset: 6bfabb71ae1e Author:weijun Date: 2013-09-09 11:08 +0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/6bfabb71ae1e 8024046: Test sun/security/krb5/runNameEquals.sh failed on 7u45 Embedded linux-ppc* Reviewed-by: xuelei ! test/sun/security/krb5/runNameEquals.sh

Re: Project to improve hs_err files

2013-09-08 Thread David Holmes
Hi Mattis, There are some interesting ideas here and generally the more crash information available the better. That said there are trade-offs in determining what information should be in a crash report versus logging/tracing output versus what should be left for post-mortem crash dump analys

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-08 Thread David Holmes
Hi Kumar, A few minor comments ... src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/jdi/SunCommandLineLauncher.java Seems to me this is all dead now: 199 /* 200 * A wrinkle in the environment: 201 * 64-bit executables are stored under $JAVA_HOME/bin/os_arch

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-08 Thread Tim Bell
Kumar - the makefile changes look good to me. Tim On 09/ 7/13 03:50 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote: This is a welcome change. I've looked at the serviceability test and the changes look good except: test/demo/jvmti/DemoRun.java test/sun/tools/jhat/HatRun.java - Looks like there are still some -d

Re: DTrace on BSD, future support

2013-09-08 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, Adding the systemtap list which has some smart people on it who can probably help out. Disclaimer: I have played a bit and hacked a bit on Systemtap and as Andrew said I did make dtrace probes in hotspot work nicely together with Systemtap a couple of years ago: http://gnu.wildebeest.org/blog

Re: DTrace on BSD, future support

2013-09-08 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > Linux doesn't use DTrace. It uses SystemTap. > > CCing Mark Wielaard who added this support: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot/rev/c707a5af0d71 Ok, then I imagine the Linux folks will not be as interested in getting dtrace

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 8024398: javac, compiler crashes with try with empty body

2013-09-08 Thread vicente . romero
Changeset: 2de3750d65a5 Author:vromero Date: 2013-09-08 11:54 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/2de3750d65a5 8024398: javac, compiler crashes with try with empty body Reviewed-by: jjg ! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/Lower.java + test/tools/jav