On 3/11/2014 10:37 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
May I have a (R)eviewer to take a look at this, please?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8058506/webrev.01
I don't understand the need for the semaphore given you do:
116 thread.join();
117 System.out.println(threa
Hi Jeremy,
I reviewed your new code and it looks fine. I had one comment in
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmanson/8062116/webrev.00/src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnv.cpp.udiff.html
The name "need_to_resolve" doesn't make sense when reading this code.
Isn't it more like "need_to_ensure_space" ? I t
On 11/3/14 10:41 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 10/31/14 3:07 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
It is 3-rd round of review for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6988950
New webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2014/jdk/6988950-JDWP-wrong-phase.3/
Thumbs up on t
On 10/31/14 3:07 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
It is 3-rd round of review for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6988950
New webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2014/jdk/6988950-JDWP-wrong-phase.3/
Thumbs up on the code. I have comment suggestions below...
src
On 11/3/14 5:33 AM, shanliang wrote:
Hi, Here is version 2:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sjiang/JDK-8046192/01/
Looks okay to me.
Thanks
Mandy
On 03/11/2014 13:33, shanliang wrote:
Hi, Here is version 2:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sjiang/JDK-8046192/01/
The modification in ./jdk/src was missed in the first version.
This looks okay to me now.
-Alan
Hi, Here is version 2:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sjiang/JDK-8046192/01/
The modification in ./jdk/src was missed in the first version.
The webreviews show only modification in the public part.
Thanks,
Shanliang
shanliang wrote:
Hi,
The fix is to remove unnecessary exports for jdk.snmp m
May I have a (R)eviewer to take a look at this, please?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8058506/webrev.01
-JB-
On 10/23/2014 03:31 PM, Erik Gahlin wrote:
Looks good!
Erik
Jaroslav Bachorik skrev 2014-10-23 11:45:
On 10/21/2014 07:47 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 10/21/2014 03:27 PM
With Mandy’s suggestions this looks good to me too.
/Staffan
> On 29 okt 2014, at 20:34, Mandy Chung wrote:
>
>
> On 10/29/2014 6:50 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>> Please review the following change
>>
>> Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8061616
>> Webrev :
>> (jdk): http:/