No problem:)
Thanks for the review,
Volker
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Staffan Larsen
staffan.lar...@oracle.com wrote:
Looks good to me. Sorry I didn’t do those changes as well.
/Staffan
On 17 mar 2015, at 18:40, Volker Simonis volker.simo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
can I please have
Hi,
Could I please have a review of this very small fix.
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064923
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ykantser/8064923/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Katja
Looks good.
Erik
Yekaterina Kantserova skrev den 18/03/15 17:37:
Hi,
Could I please have a review of this very small fix.
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064923
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ykantser/8064923/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Katja
Mainly because the long term goal (beyond the scope of this JEP, anyway)
would be to get users to slowly migrate to the annotation based M(X)Beans.
Not giving them the chance to specify the service interface via annotations
will mean keeping this dichotomy forever.
I'm not sure that is a
Thumbs up!
On 18.3.2015 18:25, Erik Gahlin wrote:
Looks good.
Erik
Yekaterina Kantserova skrev den 18/03/15 17:37:
Hi,
Could I please have a review of this very small fix.
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064923
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ykantser/8064923/webrev.00/