That makes sense to me. I think the phrase could even be as vague as
"or the name exceeds one of the implementation's limits" without
saying what those limits might be. That would leave having reasonable
limits as a quality-of-implementation issue, as it should be. The acid
test is whether we would
On 8/5/15 8:02 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 5.8.2015 16:53, Eamonn McManus wrote:
I would remove the spec changes about the limit on the domain length,
which are a property of this particular implementation. It's perfectly
reasonable to blow up if the domain length is > 536,870,911, but
there
Joe,
> +sun/tools/jhsdb/BasicLauncherTest.java macosx-all
It also failing on windows-i586 so please add generic-all
(Fixed in hs-rt as well)
-Dmitry
On 2015-08-05 19:56, joe darcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With the most recent integration of HotSpot into dev, we started seeing
> te
Hello,
With the most recent integration of HotSpot into dev, we started seeing
test failures of
sun/tools/jhsdb/BasicLauncherTest.java
The underlying problem has been fixed by JDK-8132648 in hs-rt, but until
that fix propagates, the test should be problem listed in dev:
diff -r 9bce83
That makes me sad. The limit is clearly a detail of this particular
implementation and should not be enshrined in the spec.
Éamonn
2015-08-05 8:02 GMT-07:00 Jaroslav Bachorik :
> On 5.8.2015 16:53, Eamonn McManus wrote:
>>
>> I would remove the spec changes about the limit on the domain length,
>
On 5.8.2015 16:53, Eamonn McManus wrote:
I would remove the spec changes about the limit on the domain length,
which are a property of this particular implementation. It's perfectly
reasonable to blow up if the domain length is > 536,870,911, but
there's no reason for it to be in the spec.
Well
I would remove the spec changes about the limit on the domain length,
which are a property of this particular implementation. It's perfectly
reasonable to blow up if the domain length is > 536,870,911, but
there's no reason for it to be in the spec.
Éamonn
2015-08-05 4:48 GMT-07:00 Jaroslav Bacho
On 8/4/15 1:22 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 4.8.2015 09:13, David Holmes wrote:
On 4/08/2015 5:10 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Hi David,
On 4.8.2015 02:25, David Holmes wrote:
On 4/08/2015 1:31 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following test change
Issue : https://bugs.ope
Eamonn, Daniel,
thanks for the comments.
I've updated the webrev to address them. Also, I've added a test to
exercise the boolean flag en-/decoding in ObjectName.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8041565/webrev.03
Cheers,
-JB-
On 4.8.2015 23:02, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Jaroslav,
3
