Re: RFR 8041565: JMX ObjectName could be refactored to save memory

2015-08-13 Thread Eamonn McManus
Looks fine to me (emcmanus). On Aug 13, 2015 11:13 AM, "Jaroslav Bachorik" wrote: > On 13.8.2015 02:53, Daniel Fuchs wrote: > >> Hi Jaroslav, >> >> On 12/08/15 18:05, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: >> >>> On 5.8.2015 08:04, Eamonn McManus wrote: >>> That makes me sad. The limit is clearly a detail

Re: RFR 8041565: JMX ObjectName could be refactored to save memory

2015-08-13 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On 13.8.2015 02:53, Daniel Fuchs wrote: Hi Jaroslav, On 12/08/15 18:05, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: On 5.8.2015 08:04, Eamonn McManus wrote: That makes me sad. The limit is clearly a detail of this particular implementation and should not be enshrined in the spec. Éamonn I re-requested CCC for

Re: RFR 8041565: JMX ObjectName could be refactored to save memory

2015-08-13 Thread Daniel Fuchs
Hi Jaroslav, On 12/08/15 18:05, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: On 5.8.2015 08:04, Eamonn McManus wrote: That makes me sad. The limit is clearly a detail of this particular implementation and should not be enshrined in the spec. Éamonn I re-requested CCC for not mentioning the exact limit in the doc