Everybody,
Please, review test-only fix.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8086134/webrev.01/
The test is rewritten to use testlibrary and to detect common bad environment
conditions.
Tests in Hotspot and JDK workspaces are identical, except imports and the fact
that JDK version runs
On 19.8.2015 16:32, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 19/08/2015 15:01, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
:
There are several tests in jdk/test/javax/management that exercise IIOP
if available, shouldn't they be updated too?
Not sure about this. These tests are also exercising JMXMP if
available - but that h
On 19/08/2015 15:01, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
:
There are several tests in jdk/test/javax/management that exercise IIOP
if available, shouldn't they be updated too?
Not sure about this. These tests are also exercising JMXMP if
available - but that has never been a part of JDK.
I think the
On 19.8.2015 15:05, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 19/08/2015 13:51, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
I hope I got it all this time. Used brute force search for any mention
of 'iiop' and removed anything that had anything to do with JMX.
Top level: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043937/webrev.02
JDK:
On 19/08/2015 13:51, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
I hope I got it all this time. Used brute force search for any mention
of 'iiop' and removed anything that had anything to do with JMX.
Top level: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043937/webrev.02
JDK: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8
On 19.8.2015 13:20, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 19/08/2015 11:47, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Top level changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043937/webrev.01/
JDK changes: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043937/webrev.01/jdk
I think you also need to look at jake/make/rmic/Rmic-java.ma
On 19/08/2015 11:47, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Top level changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043937/webrev.01/
JDK changes: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043937/webrev.01/jdk
I think you also need to look at jake/make/rmic/Rmic-java.management.gmk
which is where RMICONNECTOR
On 19.8.2015 11:02, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 19/08/2015 09:59, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
I missed this. However, I have my doubts about
'common/autoconf/generated-configure.sh' - the comment says this file
should not be edited but it was changed in the aforementioned commit.
Should I change it b
On 19/08/2015 09:59, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
I missed this. However, I have my doubts about
'common/autoconf/generated-configure.sh' - the comment says this file
should not be edited but it was changed in the aforementioned commit.
Should I change it back?
You will need to edit spec.gmk.in
On 19.8.2015 08:19, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 18/08/2015 15:35, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043937
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043937/webrev.00
For Java SE 8, JSR 160 was updated to downgrade the
On 19.8.2015 08:19, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 18/08/2015 15:35, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043937
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043937/webrev.00
For Java SE 8, JSR 160 was updated to downgrade the
11 matches
Mail list logo
