Hi Götz,
looks good!
..Thomas
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz <
goetz.lindenma...@sap.com> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>
>
> thanks for looking at this.
>
>
>
> > MAX2(SIGSEGV, SIGBUS)
>
> I really would like to leave the code as-is. This would be a functional
>
> change, while
Hi Dmitry,
I think this is a rather complex issue which is better documented in the
bug than in the code. The code already references the bugID.
Also, I would have to copy the explanation into three files ...
I you don't object I'll leave the comment as is.
Best regards,
Goetz.
-Origina
Hi Thomas,
thanks for looking at this.
> MAX2(SIGSEGV, SIGBUS)
I really would like to leave the code as-is. This would be a functional
change, while I only intend to fix issues in this change. Also, as David
explained, it might break for some os implementations.
> the only way to initialize it
On 16/11/2015 7:45 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:03 AM, David Holmes mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com>> wrote:
On 13/11/2015 11:38 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 13/11/2015 7:53 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Hi Goetz,
sorry for not lookin
Goetz,
On 2015-11-16 13:32, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I think this is a rather complex issue which is better documented in the
> bug than in the code. The code already references the bugID.
> Also, I would have to copy the explanation into three files ...
> I you don't object
Goetz,
Looks good for me.
Thank you for a nice cleanup.
-Dmitry
On 2015-11-16 13:25, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>
>
> thanks for looking at this.
>
>
>
>> MAX2(SIGSEGV, SIGBUS)
>
> I really would like to leave the code as-is. This would be a functional
>
> change, whil
Hi David,
thanks for looking into this issue. I'll leave the coding as is.
Best regards,
Goetz.
-Original Message-
From: David Holmes [mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com]
Sent: Montag, 16. November 2015 05:04
To: Thomas Stüfe; Lindenmaier, Goetz
Cc: serviceability-dev; hotspot-runtime-..
Hi David,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:03 AM, David Holmes
wrote:
> On 13/11/2015 11:38 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>
>> On 13/11/2015 7:53 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Goetz,
>>>
>>> sorry for not looking at this earlier. This is a nice cleanup. Some
>>> remarks:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.jav
David,
Thank you for detailed explanation. Could we put it as a comment right
into the code?
-Dmitry
On 2015-11-16 07:03, David Holmes wrote:
> On 13/11/2015 11:38 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> On 13/11/2015 7:53 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>>> Hi Goetz,
>>>
>>> sorry for not looking at this earlier. T
