Hi David,
Thank you for your comment.
Is there some reason the option string could not simply become part of the
existing configuration string?
My first proposal keeps option string at LogOutput and its child class (See
webrev.01).
Marcus commented that option string should be generated fro
Marcus commented that option string should be generated from current
configuration.
Please this email:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2016-May/019598.htm
On 2016/06/12 22:10, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi David,
Thank you for your comment.
Is there some reason the
On 12/06/2016 11:10 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi David,
Thank you for your comment.
Is there some reason the option string could not simply become part of
the existing configuration string?
My first proposal keeps option string at LogOutput and its child class
(See webrev.01).
Marcus comme
Hi David,
I think "config_string" is different from "option_string".
-Xlog format (from -Xlog:help message):
-Xlog[:[what][:[output][:[decorators][:output-options
config_string: "what" (ex. gc=trace)
option_string: "output-options" (ex. filecount=5)
Currently, LogOutput handles tags
Hi Yasumasa,
On 13/06/2016 9:30 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi David,
I think "config_string" is different from "option_string".
-Xlog format (from -Xlog:help message):
-Xlog[:[what][:[output][:[decorators][:output-options
config_string: "what" (ex. gc=trace)
option_string: "output-
On 11/06/2016 6:12 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 11/06/16 01:41, David Holmes wrote:
Better, but I still wonder what Arrays.toString prints for an empty
array?
It prints "[]" - like Collections.emptyList().toString():
Thanks Daniel.
Okay no further comments from me.
David
-
System.o
Hi David,
Thank you for your comment.
So options are a distinct property of outputs and so should have been a first
class entity in LogOutput all along.
I agree to you.
But I think we need to discuss about it with logging folks.
I uploaded a new webrev. It removes fixed buffer length and ch
Hi Yasumasa,
On 13/06/2016 1:45 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi David,
Thank you for your comment.
So options are a distinct property of outputs and so should have been
a first class entity in LogOutput all along.
I agree to you.
But I think we need to discuss about it with logging folks.
I
Thanks Staffan!
/Robbin
On 06/10/2016 09:25 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
Looks good!
Thanks,
/Staffan
On 10 juni 2016, at 09:27, Robbin Ehn wrote:
Hi all,
I can not reproduce running the tests mutiple times on mutiple platforms.
And I can not see anything particular in test code.
So I'm remo
