Hi Daniel,
As far as I see you are right.
Attach to address with empty hostname will try to connect to "external"
address instead of loopback.
--alex
On 04/01/2019 02:51, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Arthur,
Not directly related to Alex's original question but...
On 30/03/2019 00:03, Arthur Euba
On 04/01/2019 05:02, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 01/04/2019 12:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
...
Specifically on SocketTransportService.java. What Arthur has
proposed is better ( changing to lastIndexOf alone is not
sufficient ). Or is your assumption that the IPv6 literal is
not enclosed in square b
Hi Chris,
On 04/01/2019 04:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Alex,
On 29/03/2019 22:07, Alex Menkov wrote:
(added net-dev as suggested by Alan)
Net gurus, please assist in reviewing socket-related code.
New webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/IPv6/webrev.01/
Specifically on SocketTransportS
Hi Daniel, Chris,
Unfortunately docs are out-dated (I plan to update it in JDK13).
In JDK9
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8041435
changed the behavior - empty address (i.e. only port is specified) means
"local connections only", "*" means "all available connections".
Then in JDK10 new
On 01/04/2019 10:51, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Arthur,
Not directly related to Alex's original question but...
On 30/03/2019 00:03, Arthur Eubanks wrote:
We have some ipv6 patches as well in this area as well (as well as
other patches to support ipv6 only environments) that we're trying to
ups
Hi,
May I get review from serviceability? as it has minor changes in shared
code (CollectedHeap.java and ObjectHeap.java)
Thanks,
-Zhengyu
On 3/14/19 11:37 AM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
Please review this patch that provides best-effort implementation of
live regions iteration for Shenandoah GC.
The problem I was trying to understand a little better ...
I was observing an IOException, but it was not a NoSuchFileException.
Changing to catch just IOException runs cleanly, but may obscure
some other cause of the IOException.
Testing a variant today that exits cleanly as long as the lock fi
Dear All，
Here I updated the latest changeset which did the following refine:
* fixed the compatibility issues so that old version of jmap can work
normally with latest changeset.
* revised the code for parsing the jmap histo arguments.
* revised the logic for incremental d
On 01/04/2019 12:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
...
Specifically on SocketTransportService.java. What Arthur has
proposed is better ( changing to lastIndexOf alone is not
sufficient ). Or is your assumption that the IPv6 literal is
not enclosed in square brackets?
More specifically, what syntax ar
Alex,
On 29/03/2019 22:07, Alex Menkov wrote:
(added net-dev as suggested by Alan)
Net gurus, please assist in reviewing socket-related code.
New webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/IPv6/webrev.01/
Specifically on SocketTransportService.java. What Arthur has
proposed is better ( chan
Hi Arthur,
Not directly related to Alex's original question but...
On 30/03/2019 00:03, Arthur Eubanks wrote:
We have some ipv6 patches as well in this area as well (as well as other
patches to support ipv6 only environments) that we're trying to
upstream. I don't understand the code myself, b
11 matches
Mail list logo
