Re: RFR: 8221503: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/eval/eval001/eval001.java failes with: com.sun.jdi.InvalidTypeException: Can't assign double[][][] to double[][][]

2019-04-05 Thread Egor Ushakov
Hi David, thanks for your comments! I'm not sure how findComponentType worked in the current state: Type findComponentType(String signature) throws ClassNotLoadedException { 93 byte tag = (byte)signature.charAt(0); 94 if (PacketStream.isObjectTag(tag)) { 95 // It's a reference type 96 JNITypePar

RFR (XS) 8221917: serviceability/sa/TestPrintMdo.java fails on 32-bit platforms

2019-04-05 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221917 Fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8221917/webrev.01/ The failure is caused by MDO change in 11 that broke SA a little. I am planning to backport it all the way down to 11u. See bug for details. Testing: - Linux x86_32 fastdebug: T

Re: RFR (XS) 8221917: serviceability/sa/TestPrintMdo.java fails on 32-bit platforms

2019-04-05 Thread Chris Plummer
Hi Aleksey, I looked at the changes to this file that were done in JDK-8204240 (which introduced the issue), and your fix seems correct. Thumbs up! thanks, Chris On 4/5/19 8:11 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221917 Fix: http://cr.openjdk.ja

Re: 8221730: jcmd process name matching broken

2019-04-05 Thread Daniil Titov
Thank you, JC and David, for reviewing this change! Best regards, -Daniil From: Jean Christophe Beyler Date: Friday, April 5, 2019 at 9:40 AM To: David Holmes Cc: Daniil Titov , OpenJDK Serviceability , Thomas Stüfe Subject: Re: 8221730: jcmd process name matching broken Hi Daniil,

Re: RFR (XS) 8221917: serviceability/sa/TestPrintMdo.java fails on 32-bit platforms

2019-04-05 Thread David Holmes
+1 Please update copyright year. Thanks, David On 6/04/2019 3:31 am, Chris Plummer wrote: Hi Aleksey, I looked at the changes to this file that were done in JDK-8204240 (which introduced the issue), and your fix seems correct. Thumbs up! thanks, Chris On 4/5/19 8:11 AM, Aleksey Shipilev

Re: RFR: 8221730: jcmd process name matching broken

2019-04-05 Thread Chris Plummer
[I just realized I had typed this up a day or two ago and never sent it] +1, except there is a typo on the following line:   54  * was started with -m or --module option the method returns thanks, Chris On 4/3/19 5:23 PM, David Holmes wrote: Hi Daniil, This seems reasonable, but can