On 9/6/19 4:06 PM, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:17 PM Ioi Lam wrote:
On 9/6/19 11:48 AM, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:43 AM Ioi Lam wrote:
On 9/5/19 11:11 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 6/09/2019 1:39 pm, Ioi Lam wrote:
On 9/5/19 8:18 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Thank you Serguei for review!
On 9/9/19 9:14 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Thank you for filing the shadow bug and fixing this issue!
I've targeted the bug to 14 (please, fix me if it is wrong).
Yes, this is correct, thanks.
The fix looks good to me.
Do you have any plans
Hi Ivan,
Thank you for filing the shadow bug and fixing this issue!
I've targeted the bug to 14 (please, fix me if it is wrong).
The fix looks good to me.
Do you have any plans to backport it to the earlier releases?
Thanks,
Serguei
On 9/9/19 20:41, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hello!
jdb utility
Hello!
jdb utility has a command 'monitor ', which allows to execute
the specified command every time the debuggee stops.
If the modifies the list of installed monitors (the simplest
example is 'monitor unmonitor 1'), then jdb hits a
ConcurrentModificationException, and hangs the debuggee.
Hi David,
On 9/9/19 15:49, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Serguei,
. . .
The JDWP implementation is using RawMonitor's.
Please, see functions debugMonitorWait()/debugMonitorTimedWait() in
src/jdk.jdwp.agent/share/native/libjdwp/util.c.
It expects the JVMTI_ERROR_INTERRUPT but never makes a call t
Hi Serguei,
On 10/09/2019 4:26 am, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi David,
On 9/8/19 19:15, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Dan,
On 7/09/2019 6:50 am, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Hi David,
I've finally gotten back to this email thread...
Thanks.
FYI testing to date:
- tiers 1 -3 all platform
Hi David,
On 9/8/19 19:15, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Dan,
On 7/09/2019 6:50 am, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Hi David,
I've finally gotten back to this email thread...
Thanks.
Hi Serguei,
Apologies for the delay.
The errors have all been fixed, and the requested tests mostly passed,
windows and linux.
No test group had more failures post-fix than pre-fix, so I'm calling that
a win.
The new webrev can be found here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~afarley/8229378.2/web
On 9/8/19 10:15 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Dan,
On 7/09/2019 6:50 am, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Hi David,
I've finally gotten back to this email thread...
Thanks.
FYI testing to date:
- tiers 1 -3 all platforms
- hotspot: serviceability/jvmti
/jdwp
Hi Alex,
> Of course error can be cleared before each try - there is not functional
> difference.
It is just a little confusing, as you can get an exception in L. 95, too. But
I'm ok with it, if you
prefer it like this.
I would suggest, though, to sleep some ms before a retry and double th
10 matches
Mail list logo
