Re: RFR: 8240956: SEGV in DwarfParser::process_dwarf after JDK-8234624

2020-03-15 Thread David Holmes
On 16/03/2020 4:51 pm, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: On 2020/03/16 15:43, Chris Plummer wrote: BTW, if you submit it to the submit repo, we can then go and run additional internal tests (and even more builds) using that job. Thanks for that tip Chris! I've pushed the change to submit repo, but I've

Re: RFR: 8240956: SEGV in DwarfParser::process_dwarf after JDK-8234624

2020-03-15 Thread Chris Plummer
On 3/15/20 11:51 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: On 2020/03/16 15:43, Chris Plummer wrote: BTW, if you submit it to the submit repo, we can then go and run additional internal tests (and even more builds) using that job. I've pushed the change to submit repo, but I've not yet received the result.

Re: RFR: 8227269: Slow class loading when running JVM in debug mode

2020-03-15 Thread serguei.spit...@oracle.com
Hi Roman, Thank you for the update and sorry for the latency in review. Some comments are below. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/JDK-8227269/webrev.05/src/jdk.jdwp.agent/share/native/libjdwp/classTrack.c.frames.html 87 cbTrackingObjectF

Re: RFR: 8240956: SEGV in DwarfParser::process_dwarf after JDK-8234624

2020-03-15 Thread Yasumasa Suenaga
On 2020/03/16 15:43, Chris Plummer wrote: BTW, if you submit it to the submit repo, we can then go and run additional internal tests (and even more builds) using that job. I've pushed the change to submit repo, but I've not yet received the result. I will share you when I get job ID. Yasumasa

Re: RFR: 8240956: SEGV in DwarfParser::process_dwarf after JDK-8234624

2020-03-15 Thread Chris Plummer
BTW, if you submit it to the submit repo, we can then go and run additional internal tests (and even more builds) using that job. Chris On 3/15/20 11:36 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: Hi David, Thank you for testing it. I updated webrev to avoid bailout to Java frame when DWARF has language pe

Re: RFR: 8240956: SEGV in DwarfParser::process_dwarf after JDK-8234624

2020-03-15 Thread Yasumasa Suenaga
Hi David, Thank you for testing it. I updated webrev to avoid bailout to Java frame when DWARF has language personality routine or LSDA. Could you try it? http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8240956/webrev.01/ It works well on my Fedora 31 and Oracle Linux 7.7 . I've pushed it to submi

Re: RFR(L) 8238268: Many SA tests are not running on OSX because they do not attempt to use sudo when available

2020-03-15 Thread serguei.spit...@oracle.com
Hi Chris, Looks good. Thank you for update! Thanks, Serguei On 3/15/20 17:47, Chris Plummer wrote: I changed them all to "SA Attach" and grepped to make sure there are no other occurrences of "SA at

Re: RFR: 8240956: SEGV in DwarfParser::process_dwarf after JDK-8234624

2020-03-15 Thread David Holmes
Correction ... On 16/03/2020 12:53 pm, David Holmes wrote: On 16/03/2020 12:17 pm, David Holmes wrote: Hi Yasumasa, I can't review this as I know nothing about the code, but I'm putting the patch through our internal testing. Sorry but the crashes still exist: # # A fatal error has been de

Re: RFR: 8240956: SEGV in DwarfParser::process_dwarf after JDK-8234624

2020-03-15 Thread David Holmes
On 16/03/2020 12:17 pm, David Holmes wrote: Hi Yasumasa, I can't review this as I know nothing about the code, but I'm putting the patch through our internal testing. Sorry but the crashes still exist: # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at

Re: RFR: 8240956: SEGV in DwarfParser::process_dwarf after JDK-8234624

2020-03-15 Thread David Holmes
Hi Yasumasa, I can't review this as I know nothing about the code, but I'm putting the patch through our internal testing. David On 14/03/2020 11:35 am, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: Hi all, Please review this change:   JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240956   webrev: http://cr.

Re: RFR(L) 8238268: Many SA tests are not running on OSX because they do not attempt to use sudo when available

2020-03-15 Thread Chris Plummer
I changed them all to "SA Attach" and grepped to make sure there are no other occurrences of "SA attach". thanks, Chris On 3/15/20 4:49 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote: Hi Chris, looks good, thanks!

Re: RFR(L) 8238268: Many SA tests are not running on OSX because they do not attempt to use sudo when available

2020-03-15 Thread Igor Ignatyev
Hi Chris, looks good, thanks! one minor nit, in SATestUtils::skipIfCannotAttach, you have two exception messages which start with 'SA attach not expected to work.', and one w/ 'SA Attach not expected to work.' (w/ Attach instead of attach), it'd be nicer to have them uniform. Cheers, -- Igor

Re: RFR(L) 8238268: Many SA tests are not running on OSX because they do not attempt to use sudo when available

2020-03-15 Thread Chris Plummer
Hi Igor, Thanks for the review. Here's and updated webrev with all of the suggestions from you and Serguei: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8238268/webrev.01/index.html Also some comments inline below. On 3/13/20 9:26 AM, Ig