58 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Patricio,
Thanks for your advice!
I've fixed testcase as [1], but I still see an error in
validate-headers-linux-x64-build-1 on submit repo.
What does it mean? Can you share details?
mach5-one-ysuenaga-JDK-8242428-20200710-0339-12529134
Not your bug, you a
d testcase as [1], but I still see an error in
validate-headers-linux-x64-build-1 on submit repo.
What does it mean? Can you share details?
mach5-one-ysuenaga-JDK-8242428-20200710-0339-12529134
Not your bug, you are getting the header validation failure from
8248570. It was fixed two days a
Thanks Vladimir for the review.
Thanks for mentioning the reasons for MDO's not being generated, I have added
them as comment in bug for future reference.
Thanks,
Fairoz
> -Original Message-
> From: Vladimir Kozlov
> Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2020 5:36 AM
> To: Fairoz Matte ; Chris Plumm
es it mean? Can you share details?
mach5-one-ysuenaga-JDK-8242428-20200710-0339-12529134
Not your bug, you are getting the header validation failure from 8248570. It
was fixed two days ago so just update the repo and it should work now.
Thanks,
Patricio
Of course this change can be built on my
Fix is good.
I think next are reasons you don't get MDO in this scenario.
Tier1 (C1 compilation) does not generate profiling code and does not created MDO. C1 request MDO only with tiers 2 and 3
[1][2].
With -Xcomp flag a Java method is not executed in Interpreter but requests its compilation
, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Patricio,
Thanks for your advice!
I've fixed testcase as [1], but I still see an error in
validate-headers-linux-x64-build-1 on submit repo.
What does it mean? Can you share details?
mach5-one-ysuenaga-JDK-8242428-20200710-0339-12529134
Not your bug, you are gettin
On 7/10/20 4:37 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
Okay, thanks.
I already have 2 reviewers (rkennke, tschatzl), do I need more specifically
from serviceability-dev@?
Since you're touching the Serviceability team's code, it would be
polite to wait for a review...
Dan
-Aleksey
On 7/9/20 3:34 PM
Okay, thanks.
I already have 2 reviewers (rkennke, tschatzl), do I need more specifically
from serviceability-dev@?
-Aleksey
On 7/9/20 3:34 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> Adding serviceability-dev@... since a couple of JVM/TI files are changed
> in this RFR. Also, I moved the bug from hotspot
share details?
mach5-one-ysuenaga-JDK-8242428-20200710-0339-12529134
Not your bug, you are getting the header validation failure from 8248570. It
was fixed two days ago so just update the repo and it should work now.
Thanks,
Patricio
Of course this change can be built on my Linux box (Fedora 32,
