> 8263895: Test
> nsk/jvmti/GetThreadGroupChildren/getthrdgrpchld001/getthrdgrpchld001.cpp uses
> incorrect indices
Leonid Mesnik has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Copyright updated.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.op
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:33:26 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Yasumasa Suenaga has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update testcases
>
> The changes look good. Just curious though, why are all the debugd tests
> excluded on windo
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 22:20:35 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
> 8263895: Test
> nsk/jvmti/GetThreadGroupChildren/getthrdgrpchld001/getthrdgrpchld001.cpp uses
> incorrect indices
Marked as reviewed by amenkov (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3098
8263895: Test
nsk/jvmti/GetThreadGroupChildren/getthrdgrpchld001/getthrdgrpchld001.cpp uses
incorrect indices
-
Commit messages:
- 8263895: Test
nsk/jvmti/GetThreadGroupChildren/getthrdgrpchld001/getthrdgrpchld001.cpp uses
incorrect indices
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/
> Add three tests from JDK-4413752 ported to JVM/TI:
>
> - RawMonitorEnter() with SuspendThread()
> -
> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/SuspendWithRawMonitorEnter/SuspendWithRawMonitorEnter.java
> -
> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/SuspendWithRawMonitorEnter/libSuspendWithRa
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:17:10 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>> jhsdb supports pmap (jhsdb jmap) and pstack (jhsdb jstack --mixed), and they
>> work fine if they attach to live process or to coredump, however they do not
>> work on debug server as following:
>>
>> $ jhsdb jmap --connect localhost
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:21:06 GMT, Lin Zang wrote:
> IMO, it is better to dump all array object in `write-through` mode, because
> it could avoid memory consumption and performance issue when dumping large
> array. And the original implementation of object dump works like
> `write-through`, so
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:18:07 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> Add three tests from JDK-4413752 ported to JVM/TI:
>>
>> - RawMonitorEnter() with SuspendThread()
>> -
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/SuspendWithRawMonitorEnter/SuspendWithRawMonitorEnter.java
>> -
>> test/hotspot/jtre
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 23:42:46 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> The test requests NotifyFrame event from MethodEntry handler expecting that
> 1st MethodEntry event is generated for main thread.
> The fix adds a check that the thread is correct and skips event from other
> threads
This pull request has
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 23:12:47 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> The fix updates the test to skip ThreadStartEvent/ThreadDeathEvent from other
> threads
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 57fc8e9b
Author:Alex Menkov
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/57fc8e9b
Stat
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:40:57 GMT, Lin Zang wrote:
> * Is it acceptable that `jmap -dump` and `jmap -histo` have different
> behavior about the option of `parallel`, that is, `heapdump` does not use it
> and `heaphisto` does.
And just to further clarify, the parallel support for `jmap -histo` i
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 06:09:25 GMT, Koichi Sakata wrote:
>> When running jstack with mixed option, the output of the lines that doesn't
>> have an address are misaligned as followings.
>>
>> $ sudo jhsdb jstack --mixed --pid 8281
>> - 8330 -
>> "event-handler" #20
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:49:39 GMT, Koichi Sakata wrote:
> When a heap is used more than about 2.1GB, clhsdb jhisto shows a negative
> number in the total field.
>
> $ java -Xmx20g Sample
>
> $ jhsdb clhsdb --pid 5773
> Attaching to process 5773, please wait...
> hsdb> jhisto
> ...
> 299:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 03:54:35 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> This a new test that runs jstack on a process that is busy doing things. It
> runs jstack 4 times as the process is starting up.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: ed701ea6
Author:Chris Plummer
URL: https://
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 00:28:48 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Added clhsdb help for findsym, which was missed when the findsym command was
> recently added. Also fixed a very minor typo in the findpc help.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 30da9bc3
Author:Chris Plummer
URL:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:13:58 GMT, Alex Blewitt
wrote:
>> As with #2993 changing the order of `final static` to `static final` for the
>> `java.management`, `java.management.rmi` and `java.naming` modules.
>
> Alex Blewitt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit
> As with #2993 changing the order of `final static` to `static final` for the
> `java.management`, `java.management.rmi` and `java.naming` modules.
Alex Blewitt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Added more replacements of 'final pu
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:26:20 GMT, Alex Blewitt
wrote:
> As with #2993 changing the order of `final static` to `static final` for the
> `java.management`, `java.management.rmi` and `java.naming` modules.
Overall good - found a few cases where the private modifier is in the wrong
place that oug
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:28:12 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> Thanks @cl4es -- do I need to update the git commit message as well, or is
>> updating the title of the PR sufficient? I recall you suggesting not to do
>> amend/rebases previously.
>
> No, the git commit messages here doesn't matter, t
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:08:24 GMT, Alex Blewitt
wrote:
>> Created the subtask https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8263855 for
>> this along with an umbrella RFE.
>
> Thanks @cl4es -- do I need to update the git commit message as well, or is
> updating the title of the PR sufficient? I reca
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:01:45 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> @cl4es would you mind creating a parent task of something like "Source code
>> cleanups" and then another sub task for this change please?
>
> Created the subtask https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8263855 for this
> along with an
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:20:39 GMT, Alex Blewitt
wrote:
>> Would someone mind creating a bug for me? In addition, if it would help, we
>> could create a parent bug for applying cleanups and associate #2993 and
>> #2991.
>
> @cl4es would you mind creating a parent task of something like "Source
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:33:59 GMT, Alex Blewitt
wrote:
>> As with #2993 changing the order of `final static` to `static final` for the
>> `java.management`, `java.management.rmi` and `java.naming` modules.
>
> Would someone mind creating a bug for me? In addition, if it would help, we
> could c
As with #2993 changing the order of `final static` to `static final` for the
`java.management`, `java.management.rmi` and `java.naming` modules.
-
Commit messages:
- Use the blessed modifier order in java.management/naming
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3078/files
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:26:20 GMT, Alex Blewitt
wrote:
> As with #2993 changing the order of `final static` to `static final` for the
> `java.management`, `java.management.rmi` and `java.naming` modules.
Would someone mind creating a bug for me? In addition, if it would help, we
could create a
When a heap is used more than about 2.1GB, clhsdb jhisto shows a negative
number in the total field.
$ java -Xmx20g Sample
$ jhsdb clhsdb --pid 5773
Attaching to process 5773, please wait...
hsdb> jhisto
...
299:1 16 jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe
300:34021073761
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 23:29:31 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Thank you for your comment, @plummercj.
>>
>>> What testing have you done?
>>
>> I added the content of the test that I've done in the body text.
>>
>>> Please update the copyright to 2021.
>>
>> Sure!
>>
>>> I noticed that in you ori
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 03:11:32 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Yasumasa Suenaga has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update testcase name
>
> Marked as reviewed by cjplummer (Reviewer).
PiNG: could you review this? I need one more
28 matches
Mail list logo
