Re: RFR: 8269851: OperatingSystemMXBean getProcessCpuLoad reports incorrect process cpu usage in containers [v8]

2021-07-27 Thread Jie Fu
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 04:00:39 GMT, xpbob wrote: >> …ocess cpu usage in containers > > xpbob has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit > since the last revision: > > Add comments Will sponsor it tomorrow if there is no objection. Thanks. - PR: https:

Integrated: 8271323: [TESTBUG] serviceability/sa/ClhsdbCDSCore.java fails with -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1

2021-07-27 Thread Nick Gasson
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 09:24:38 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote: > This test fails reliably with `-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1` since JDK-8251462. > MDOs are no longer allocated in this mode so the clhsdb `printmdo -a` command > prints nothing. The failure is basically the same as JDK-8236042 which > happened

Integrated: 8261236: C2: ClhsdbJstackXcompStress test fails when StressGCM is enabled

2021-07-27 Thread Nick Gasson
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:24:56 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote: > The clhsdb jstack command crashes when the debugged program is run with > `-Xcomp -XX:+StressGCM -XX:StressSeed=2` on AArch64: > > > sun.jvm.hotspot.utilities.AssertionFailure: sanity check > at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.utilit

Re: Information about possible JDB enhancements

2021-07-27 Thread Jakob Cornell
Thanks for the help Chris. With the JBS ticket set up are we ready for a PR to be opened, or should I wait for the CSR review? Jakob

Re: Information about possible JDB enhancements

2021-07-27 Thread Chris Plummer
On 7/27/21 4:38 PM, Jakob Cornell wrote: Hi all, I've prepared a patch that makes JDB rerun the previous command when nothing is entered at the prompt.  Looks like the next step is to open a JBS issue so I can submit a PR, but as a new contributor I don't have credentials to open a JBS issue.

Re: Information about possible JDB enhancements

2021-07-27 Thread Jakob Cornell
Oops, the mailman didn't link this to the previous thread: https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2021-June/038226.html

Re: Information about possible JDB enhancements

2021-07-27 Thread Jakob Cornell
Hi all, I've prepared a patch that makes JDB rerun the previous command when nothing is entered at the prompt. Looks like the next step is to open a JBS issue so I can submit a PR, but as a new contributor I don't have credentials to open a JBS issue. Is anybody willing to sponsor my change?

Re: RFR: 8271323: [TESTBUG] serviceability/sa/ClhsdbCDSCore.java fails with -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1

2021-07-27 Thread Vladimir Kozlov
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 09:24:38 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote: > This test fails reliably with `-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1` since JDK-8251462. > MDOs are no longer allocated in this mode so the clhsdb `printmdo -a` command > prints nothing. The failure is basically the same as JDK-8236042 which > happened

Re: RFR: 8271323: [TESTBUG] serviceability/sa/ClhsdbCDSCore.java fails with -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1

2021-07-27 Thread Chris Plummer
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 09:24:38 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote: > This test fails reliably with `-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1` since JDK-8251462. > MDOs are no longer allocated in this mode so the clhsdb `printmdo -a` command > prints nothing. The failure is basically the same as JDK-8236042 which > happened

Re: RFR: 8261236: C2: ClhsdbJstackXcompStress test fails when StressGCM is enabled

2021-07-27 Thread Vladimir Kozlov
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:24:56 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote: > The clhsdb jstack command crashes when the debugged program is run with > `-Xcomp -XX:+StressGCM -XX:StressSeed=2` on AArch64: > > > sun.jvm.hotspot.utilities.AssertionFailure: sanity check > at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.utilit

RFR: 8271323: [TESTBUG] serviceability/sa/ClhsdbCDSCore.java fails with -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1

2021-07-27 Thread Nick Gasson
This test fails reliably with `-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1` since JDK-8251462. MDOs are no longer allocated in this mode so the clhsdb `printmdo -a` command prints nothing. The failure is basically the same as JDK-8236042 which happened with `-Xcomp -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1` so the workaround for th